More thoughts on “Forget Shorter Showers”

In my book, and elsewhere on this blog, I have commented on Derrick Jensen’s well-known piece “Forget Shorter Showers: Why Personal Change Does Not Equal Political Change.”

When I first read that article, some years ago, it came across to me as saying that there’s no point in making any personal change. I later realized that wasn’t what he was saying. But I still think he underplays the importance of personal everyday choices. And I have observed many of my fellow environmentalist falling into the same thinking.

When I hear Jensen and many other climate-aware people saying that our personal choices are just a drop in the bucket, I always feel that they are overlooking or at least radically underestimating, the “beneficial contagion” factor that our personal everyday choices can have. We do influence the people around us, to a degree that goes beyond the mere simple math of our reduction in water use, electricity use, and so on.

There’s also the basic simple truth that we can’t expect government and corporations to change the entire structure of systems, while consumer demand continues to push them in the opposite direction.

That is not to say that personal changes are any substitute for activism. We all need to be activists however we can.

A fellow member of the Degrowth group brought up Jensen’s article the other day, and shared the following quote from the article. (I’ve shared the link to the full article for you at the end of this post):

“Would any sane person think dumpster diving would have stopped Hitler, or that composting would have ended slavery or brought about the eight-hour workday, or that chopping wood and carrying water would have gotten people out of Tsarist prisons, or that dancing naked around a fire would have helped put in place the Voting Rights Act of 1957 or the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Then why now, with all the world at stake, do so many people retreat into these entirely personal “solutions”?

“The good news is that there are other options. We can follow the examples of brave activists who lived through the difficult times I mentioned–Nazi Germany, Tsarist Russia, antebellum United States–who did far more than manifest a form of moral purity; they actively opposed the injustices that surrounded them. We can follow the example of those who remembered that the role of an activist is not to navigate systems of oppressive power with as much integrity as possible, but rather to confront and take down those systems.

“I want to be clear. I’m not saying we shouldn’t live simply. I live reasonably simply myself, but I don’t pretend that not buying much (or not driving much, or not having kids) is a powerful political act, or that it’s deeply revolutionary. It’s not. Personal change doesn’t equal social change.”

I responded:

For sure the above is true. That said:
What collecting rainwater, and radically reducing one’s energy consumption, and doing without a car if possible, and minimizing housing cost and footprint etc etc etc, can do Is help us get out from under the system that we’re trying to change.

And if we are less vulnerable to the systems, have less to lose, then we are more able to be outspoken and try to change the systems.

People who can’t afford to speak against the system, people who are stuck in the system, are the ones that we are trying to help.

Also, a personal sense of peace is very helpful in activism. I’m talking about genuine personal peace, not spiritual bypassing.

Also, although my tiny individual actions don’t add up to much, the fact is that personal practices can be very contagious. And that kind of contagion can be an onramp for social trends, which can definitely lead to massive change.

Additional thoughts:

Another important thing is that when we are fully living our values, or as close to it as we are able to manage in the current system, we get a certain power. Maybe a good phrase for it would be moral influence.

The climate deniers, ultra-far-right nationalists, etc., are very often living by their stated values and in accordance with their stated beliefs.

Meanwhile, many of us who call ourselves environmentalist, Degrowthers, Permaculturists, etc. are falling very far short of our stated beliefs and values.

We claim to believe that climate change is an extremely urgent matter. Ditto ecosystems restoration. And social justice … etc.

And yet: So many “eco” people continue to jetset all over the planet (including my personal favorite, flying to climate conferences, flying to permaculture classes and nature festivals in exotic overseas locations and that kind of thing). Constantly fly across continents & oceans to visit their families (rather than, say, move to be near their families), hoard land & extra houses, continue to keep their money on Wall Street, etc.

And there’s a certain unease that goes with not really living up to our values because we’re afraid of the consequences. And that unease gets transmitted, I think. It makes us less influential.

It starts to make sense that the environmental movement is not as persuasive as it could be. We are more persuasive when we are living more closely in tune with what we claim to believe.

In everyday life, it’s extremely hard to be fully in integrity with environmental beliefs. I am constantly feeling guilty about the amount of plastic packaging I end up accepting. And industrial factory food when it’s very hard to get ethically raised local food etc. etc. And buying consumer products that end up not being the best use of my money even though I thought they were going to be useful.

Each of us has some areas of consumption that we probably find easier to cut than other areas, and other aspects that we find harder. Obviously people living in cities will find it easier to do without a car, for example. Or share a car.

But there’s a lot that people can do still. And I’m always devastated when I see some fellow permaculture person tearing up a bunch of rural land to build a giant house. Or taking up a huge amount of acreage for just one or two people. Or gentrifying other countries because the cost-of-living is cheaper there.

We’re supposed to be setting the example.

Our personal behaviors do matter even though there is no substitute for systemic activism. I actually find it easier to do one if I’m doing the other also.

Maybe part of our role as degrowth activists and other eco-folk is to help and nurture each other so that we can ease our fears of letting go of harmful systems & behaviors. It can definitely feel very vulnerable to let go of things such as retirement accounts etc. Mutual aid may be a very under-explored area for a lot of us.

PS. A prime example of “the power that comes from beneath” is the retirement accounts of millions of middle-class people. We find it easy to decry the morality of millionaires and billionaires and corporations — but don’t seem to want to notice how we ourselves are propping them up.

Further exploration:

• Go here to read Jensen’s piece in its entirety: https://www.commondreams.org/views/2009/07/08/forget-shorter-showers-why-personal-change-does-not-equal-political-change

Rainwater collection: practicality & aesthetics

Self-Sufficient Backyard – by Ron and Johanna always has a wealth of good tips & pics! I like how they have their rainbarrels lined up neatly along the fence line. (Here is the link to their post that I shared.) As the authors point out, there are many practical reasons for this.

Myself, I too try to keep my rainwater storage neat and tidy, as a kindness to my neighbors as well as myself preferring that human-made stuff has a streamlined look. Neighbors and code enforcement authorities will be more sympathetic towards eco infrastructure projects if we make them neat & aesthetically appealing.

However, unlike many of my fellow “prepper” types, I do not try to hide my rainwater storage. My goal is actually to showcase my rainwater collection setup in order to get more of my neighbors & other people interested in doing it, because we all need to be doing it.

That said, my rainwater tanks are in the backyard, because the best collection spot is there. But (contrary to my mission of public education to promote community resilience), that area is generally invisible from public view. So I showcase my rainwater collection virtually — via social media, my public talks, and my book & blog.

Check the comments under my FB post for a photo of my main rainwater collection zone.

Degrowth and eco-footprint

If you’ve read my book, you may remember that one of the categories that offer us opportunity to reduce our eco-footprint is consumption. What we buy and spend.

In the years since I published my book, I have become more aware of how income itself relates to eco-footprint.

Love this summation from fellow Degrowther Alan Kirk — thank you for this Alan:

“… [T]he first paragraph of the OP is quite important. Earning and spending very little into the economy is the backbone of Degrowth; what we earn and spend is a very direct proxy of our impact, i.e. eco-footprint. Earning and spending an average or higher income overwhelms any virtue being signaled by displaying veganism.”

By the way, the original post, by Chris Morasky, is set to public and you can view it here. Titled “Should modern people hunt and gather,” it’s very worthwhile, and sparked a wealth of viewpoints in the comments.

“I’m old; there’s nothing I can do”

… And the variants such as, “My generation is hopeless! It’ll have to be up to the younger generations to change things.”

Yeah … NO. We do not get to just adopt this attitude and sail off into our happy dotage! We have to push past this mentality! (“We” being older people in the privileged classes.)

So, if you’ve been feeling like this, here are some immediate easy first steps for you:

• Read this article recommended by a friend of mine who’s an environmental sciences professor and public official. I really trust her assessments of things. My friend commented, “I told [a friend] last month that June felt like the long anticipated ‘tipping point.’ I (obsessively) follow several national and international (data-based) agency websites to watch trends in atmospheric chemistry and temperature, oceanic temperature, sea and land ice extent, etc., and my mouth has been agape the past several weeks watching the records break out of the pack of multi-year steady increases. We’re all feeling the effects — heat domes in the south and catastrophic flooding in the north plus wildfires, but the data confirm that this year is truly unprecedented. This excellent article pulls all of those factors into one place to review. Very good article; very bad news.” Here’s the article she’s talking about: “The world just broke a stunning slew of heat records. Why right now?” (Bob Henson; Yale Climate Connections).

• Read this article “What baby boomers can do about climate change” (Bill McKibben; Yale Climate Connections.)

Check out Third Act, an organization founded by McKibben to empower people over 60 to address climate and racial-justice issues.

Travel question

(This came via the comments section of a Washington Post article about the 50th anniversary of the Lonely Planet travel guides.)

Q. What are the negative impacts of travel that you’re thinking of? And what are the virtual travel options you like?

— Impacts: There are economic, social, and environmental impacts. Yes, there are positive impacts as well, but overall the negative impacts tend to outweigh the positive. There’s lots of information about this out there. Just now I found this paper that gives a pretty good overview, succinctly:

https://hwb.gov.wales/api/storage/8e18c0d6-3393-42c3-ae62-09648421cc61/Section7-ImpactsofTourism.pdf

I also recommend a paper titled “Lovely Hula Hands” by Kay Haunani-Trask.

And here’s an article I found a while back and have meant to share with you. The tourism industry and drug trafficking in Mexico: from the perspective of the Mayan Peoples (Angel Sulub for Debates Indígenas; posted on iwgia.org). “… Education also took place in the milpa, which was the space for work, rituals, socialization, and learning. The children and youth were guided by the grandparents in their love for the land, the seeds, and the sense of community. The grandmothers say that misery began when the school imposed by the Mexican State arrived: the teachers taught that the milpa was for ‘poor people’ and that, to get ahead and better oneself, it was necessary to study and find a good job. Today, the ‘good job’ that the system offers the Mayan is typically that of an office job in a large hotel …”

— Virtual travel: Well, there’s the old-fashioned mode of virtual travel: National Geographic magazine and the like. TV shows too.

And nowadays, there are also various online services that allow people to take virtual walking tours of their destination of choice. I have even heard of personal tourguides that will take people on a virtual tour of their village etc.

For those of us who have had ample opportunity to travel as young people, and who are concerned about the negative impacts of travel, should the hot new travel destination be “stay home and get to know our own places more deeply”?

I particularly issue this challenge to my generation, the Boomers. Specifically, those of us who identify as “liberal” and claim to be concerned about the planet, climate change and such.

A familiar refrain is that travel is necessary in order to get to know other people and cultures. But we should be able to develop basic empathy and decency without consumerizing the planet. People have been doing it for millennia: developing sensitivity, decency, and maturity without jetsetting all over the place.

Further exploration:

Googling “virtual travel” reveals a number of sites. Here are just a couple. If you try them, let me know how it goes!

Virtual Vacation: https://virtualvacation.us . “Walk around 100+ cities across the globe. Admire the beautiful scenery and street sounds.”

Globotreks: https://www.globotreks.com/tips/best-virtual-tours-world/ “Can’t travel? Here are 45+ of the best virtual tours around the world.”

• And of course, you can also just Google any place of your choosing and look at various photos and videos that pop up. You can do the same with your map app, selecting the street view.

Make a million a year as a farmer?

(This post was prompted by a video that came across my feed. I am sharing the screenshot only.)

Looking at the land in the background … If I have to do this to the land in order to make a million, I will pass on the million.

Actually I will pass on the million, period. I would rather make sure that everyone has enough (including my local farmers who are just trying to stay afloat), than myself become yet another millionaire who doesn’t need to exist.

Update: In a Florida farming group where I also posted this, and asked the video author if this was his farm, he responded that this was the shot from the plane; one of the members of a moringa-growing collective flew him out to see his farm in Sacramento.

Which in itself opens up many other avenues of thought & discussion …

Not the least of which (looking through my occupational lens as an activist and educator promoting low-footprint living and permaculture-informed lifestyle design) is that the sustainability community really needs to start embracing teleconferencing more, and jetsetting less.

Working with local govt: Neighbors push for elimination of “nonfunctional turfgrass” on city, county land

(Example of neighbors getting together to adopt a resolution to ask local government to eliminate turfgrass from spaces that are not meant for foot traffic. And instead allow the region’s unique natural vegetation to be the default.)

Update Nov 2, 2023: My reading of the resolution at City Commission went well. I was particularly appreciative of Mayor Henry’s excellent question, which gave us such a nice opportunity to expand upon the aesthetic thing.

You can check out the video here. Scroll to the citizen comment section which is near the end, right after the official meeting ends. https://codb.civicweb.net/document/155216/?splitscreen=true&media=true

Update Nov 8, 2023:

Yesterday I read our “Greening the Beachside” resolution at County Council. The response was very positive! There was good commentary from commissioners at the end of the day regarding our proposal of replacing nonfunctional turfgrass with natural, beautiful dune vegetation that requires no irrigation or chemicals.

County council meeting yesterday — Tuesday, November 7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4ScykXWybk

I spoke during Citizens Participation period #1, at the beginning of the day; and again during Citizens Participation period 2, at the end of the day.

In the first comment period, I read the resolution out loud. The first general comment period for citizens is right at the beginning of the meeting. I can’t remember, but I may have been the fourth speaker?

The second general comment period for citizens is late in the afternoon. It’s before commissioner comments that wrap up the day. In the second comment period, I made some followup comments:

  • Praising a couple of county public lands on the beachside that are great examples of dune vegetation. (Specifically, Andy Romano park; and the Kemp St pedestrian entrance to the beach.) 
  • And, connecting our unnatural landscaping practices (excess mowing etc.) to the excess gasoline consumption that is driving demand for fuel tank facilities and other problematic stuff.

(Here is my Facebook post where I invited neighbors to participate in promoting the resolution):

Update: My reading of the resolution at City Commission went well. You can check out the video here. Scroll to the citizen comment section which is near the end, right after the official meeting ends. https://codb.civicweb.net/document/155216/?splitscreen=true&media=true


A resolution on greening the beachside!

Hello Neighbors!!
At a recent meeting of Beachside Neighborhood Watch, members unanimously approved a motion to adopt a resolution that would eliminate the use of all
non-functional turfgrass from city property and county property on the beachside.

Non-functional turfgrass is turfgrass that is not meant for foot traffic. Examples of non-functional turfgrass include median strips, and the edges of parking lots.

(Functional turfgrass is turfgrass that is meant for foot traffic. Examples include ballfields, event spaces, and dog parks.)

This change in our landscaping practices can be expected to save significant amounts of money and fuel, while reducing air pollution and noise pollution, and conserving water that is now being consumed to irrigate non-functional turfgrass.

Besides being beautiful, our low-maintenance beachside wildflowers, tall coastal grasses, and other natural dune vegetation are also drought-tolerant and require no chemical spraying to maintain.

This resolution will be a win for heat mitigation, stormwater absorption, resource saving, and unique regional beauty for tourists and residents alike.

I will be reading the BNW’s resolution aloud this evening, Wednesday, November 1, during citizens’ comment time at the Daytona Beach City Commission meeting. Other BNW members will be in attendance as well.

All are invited to attend. Whether or not you live on beachside, you are welcome to come and show your support. You can also tune in online via the city’s website.

These photos show examples of natural beachside vegetation that requires no irrigation, no chemicals, and no extreme maintenance practices.

(Here is the original text of the resolution which I read aloud to the City Commission and County Commission):

A resolution on greening the beachside

BNW requests that the city and the county discontinue the use of non-functional turfgrass on all their property on the beachside. Non-functional turfgrass is turfgrass that is not meant for foot traffic, for example, median strips and the edges of parking lots.

Nonfunctional turfgrass will die a natural death in the absence of chemicals and irrigation. Beach wildflowers would sprout up amidst the dead grass or tall coastal grasses and other native plants could be planted. The new growth should require no mowing, edging, irrigation, or chemicals.

BNW also requests that the city and county revisit landscaping requirements on commercial beachside properties. Too often required landscaping is more intrusive and less attractive than using native beachside plants that will thrive naturally.

These new styles of growth would conserve water, enhance the stormwater sponge, reduce pollution of our waterways, reduce noise pollution and fumes, and support beach wildlife. The more natural esthetic would showcase the authentic beauty of our beach environment for tourists and residents alike and it would save money, allowing resources to be redirected to urgent citywide heat-mitigation needs such as planting trees.

Our hope is the city’s and county’s example will motivate many private homeowners and business owners to reduce or eliminate turfgrass and use of non-native plants on their beachside properties.

By taking care of our beachside in this way, Daytona Beach and Volusia County would become a progressive actor in the nationwide movement to promote the distinctive natural vegetation of each region; we could help move the needle in a more beautiful and healthy direction.

These photos from my post on the BNW Facebook page show examples of natural beachside vegetation that requires no irrigation, no chemicals, and no extreme maintenance practices.