Reading list for a collapse/adaptation study group

Someone in the Deep Adaptation group is starting a study group in their community. And asked for recommendations of books and other texts.

They mentioned they are interested in both fiction and nonfiction (very wise, in my experience — fiction can convey a lot of deep truth), and books as well as other media.

I am pasting here some of the recommendations that people mentioned in the comments. I will add to this list as I come across more recommendations.

Here are some titles one member recommended; I will try to dig up the authors etc. as time permits.

•Breaking Together
• Another End of the World is Possible
• On Freedom (Maggie Nelson)
• We’re Doomed Now What?
• Climate Wars
• Deep Green Resistance
• The Resilience Imperative
• Mossbacks

• Michael Dowd’s “Post Doom” series includes both audio and written works. https://postdoom.com/

• Carolyn Baker’s books Undaunted and Love in the Age of Ecological Apocalypse. As the DA member who recommended these so aptly puts it, “I don’t need the science anymore. I need to figure out how to be.” Carolyn Baker has YouTube interviews also.

• I also recommend Eye of the Storm: Facing Climate and Social Chaos, by Terry LePage, who is a member of the Deep Adaptation group. (BTW Terry is hosting a zoom book club for the book starting this Saturday January 13, 2024. Check the Deep Adaptation group for details and sign up. Hope to see you there!)

CULTIVATING COMPASSION

To the many excellent recommendations that others have suggested, I would very strongly recommend some reading about cultivating compassion.

I gave this topic a whole header by itself. Because, in my experience, compassion is the ultimate adaptive trait for a society, and for individuals.

Here is an excellent short compilation that gives great practical tips for everyday people on how to cultivate compassion. How To Be a Bodhisattva https://www.lionsroar.com/how-to-be-a-bodhisattva-2/ (Thich Nhat Hanh; Lion’s Roar)

HOW TO BE A BODHISATTVA
It may seem like an unattainable ideal, but you can start right now as a bodhisattva-in-training. All you need is the aspiration to put others first.
THICH NHAT HANH
14 MARCH 2023

  • Everyone Is Your Guest
    Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche on your life as a future bodhisattva
  • 6 Baby Steps to Kindness
    The path of compassion, says Judy Lief, starts with stepping out of your usual storyline. Here are five ways to do it.
  • You Deserve Compassion Too
    Compassion makes no distinction between self and other, says Christina Feldman. Care for your own suffering in the same way you care for others’.
  • The Buddha’s Love
    Thich Nhat Hanh describes how love for one person becomes love for all.
  • Unbearable Compassion
    For our compassion to be effective, says Ogyen Trinley Dorje, the 17th Karmapa, it must be as unbearable as the world’s suffering is.
  • Toward a Culture of Love
    Love is the ultimate transgression, bell hooks argues. Its transformative power can shatter the status quo.

compassion, bodhisattva

Free car can be very expensive

I had to take a deep breath when I read this post on a friend’s page, because of their assumption that people who are walking must surely want a car. Very American and very car-centric.

But, I reminded myself that the post arose from a kind, generous, empathetic intention.

The post:

CAR DONATION NEEDED. There are 3 men in <city> that I’ve never met, but around 5 PM they are always walking on __ Road sometimes they are in uniform. Not sure who they are but I have been seeing them for at least a year walking. … if anyone has one they want to donate I can help with transfer fees. I love to see people work and these men are obviously coming from some sort of employment and walking at that.

My response:

You are so kindhearted always!

Things to consider: They may have a good reason for walking.

  • They may not have their driver’s licenses, and may not be eligible for driver’s licenses.
  • A car, even a free car, is very expensive for the recipient, and depending on their income it could be out of their range. (I speak from personal experience as a person who was once offered a free car and would have had to turn it down even if I wanted it.) Even if the car is free, they have to worry about gasoline, maintenance, insurance, repairs, and all of those other things. (But maybe as <another friend commenting> suggested, they would want a bicycle or scooter, which is a lot more affordable to keep.)
  • I know this sounds crazy, because a lot of people I’ve met in Florida assume that a person who is walking can’t possibly be enjoying it, and must surely want to be in a car. But they might actually enjoy the walk. Sometimes a walk allows a person to socialize and unwind and get fresh air, even if they have been working at hard labor all day.
  • They might only be walking a short way. And they might not have car parking available at their living situation or workplace.

Not trying to sound negative!! Just mentioning these things because car owners don’t necessarily think about them.

Still, it’s worth maybe talking to them, seeing what they say. And regardless, three cheers to you always for your kind heart.

PS. Something I refrained from writing in my response to friend’s post is that I have long considered cars to be an inferior mode of transport to just about any other mode, in so many ways.

Transitioning a travel business

A member of the DA group has an import business (Moroccan rugs), which also has a tourist guide side to it. She feels a dilemma as far as eco sustainability of the travel business (particularly given that Morocco is in extreme drought, and experienced its first 50 C day last summer), and yet the artisans depend on income from tourists who buy their rugs.

This is such a great question! (Visit the Deep Adaptation group on Facebook and type “Morocco” in the search field; that should bring up the thread.)

Hi! Thank you so much for posting this question. It’s such a good one, and I love the responses that others have already given.

Some years back, I felt compelled to transition the in-person aspect of my occupation (sustainability educator) to eliminate long-distance travel.

I used to travel to teach/speak in person; now I am primarily a book writer and blogger, also post short videos. (I do still speak in person locally in my community.)

A little while back, while researching for a blog post the issue you bring up – because it is something that affects a lot of my readers/clientd – I found a tourism model that feels very attractive to me and might work for you.

Some people in Kazakhstan, a country I have long felt intrigued with and interested in visiting, have started a virtual tour guide business. Virtual tour guides connect with customers by teleconference app such as Zoom or Facetime, and basically walk the customer into the village / marketplace.

The customer gets to shop, pick out rugs or clothing or other traditional handcrafted items. Which the customer pays for online via secure app, and then the items are shipped to the customer.

Thanks to the internet, and the tour guide’s camera, the customer gets to talk face to face with local people, even sit down for a chat over coffee or tea etc., and see realtime views of the village, countryside, etc.

it is very likely that I will sign up for one of these virtual tours.

As a person in her 60s, who for some years traveled extensively for work and also had the privilege of taking a number of trips for her own enjoyment and education, I feel very happy to be able to switch to a mode of travel that is ethical.

If you were to offer this for morocco, I would almost certainly sign up, as I am extremely intrigued with Morocco and would love to visit there if it were not for the eco-footprint and the harm that tourism can do to local economies.

The virtual option seems to radically lessen the negative impact, while boosting the positive impact on locals.

(Side note, Regarding the carbon footprint of one’s occupation:
I also retroactively purchased carbon offsets for every single flight I could remember taking in my adult life, but I do know that carbon offsets are by no means perfect. I have taken a no-flight pledge for the duration of the rest of my life, and/or duration of the climate crisis.)

Highest regards to you, thanks for being in this group and thanks for posting your question. And do keep us informed about what approach you decide to take!

And my response to a person in the comment section who says she is 70 years old and is “selfishly” traveling by plane to see all the places she had dreamed of visiting for her whole life:

I really love and can relate to what you have written here. BTW if you are interested in options for mitigating your plane travel, if you do not already have a way to mitigate, I hear that Gold Standard are the best type of offsets.

Gold Standard offsets are focused on new tree planting & other projects, rather than taking multiple credit for existing projects, so they avoid a pitfall of many so-called carbon offsets. And, they only add a few dollars to the price of a ticket.

I no longer fly, but I purchased Gold Standard offsets to retroactively mitigate the impact of every flight I could remember taking in my adult life.

Ableism in doomer, prepper, permie circles

Another sub topic that came up in the Ecovillage thread I’ve been posting about. Is ableism. One person commented that they are not in an ecovillage because, in their current place:

“… the access to medical care … is beyond what we could find in a small community. Sometimes I struggle with the ableism in adaptation and prep discussions. (Not blaming anybody, just trying to see how we spoonies will find our place when we can’t contribute physically.)”

To which I replied:

Thank you and everyone else who is continuing to bring this aspect up, ableism is an extremely important thing to address. For any community! No community can be sustainable without addressing the needs of all of its members.

Prepper culture, and the dominant culture as a whole, is hyperindividualistic and focuses too much on the material aspect of things. So much is missed, many of us have non-material contributions to make that are every bit as important to the collective survival and thrival.

PS. I even challenge the notion that people don’t have something to contribute physically just because they might have chronic conditions or what have you. Our culture really does undervalue regular daily tasks like child-minding, watching over animals, serving as historians/archivists, and so on, all of which people of many different abilities can do. And people of all ages, right up to the most elder of elders!

Other essential functions include art, storytelling, music. All of these can be done by people who are not necessarily young and physically sturdy. In fact, some of the greatest artists and musicians and storytellers have been physically frail and/or living with mental health conditions.

And yes, the arts, music, storytelling, performance, and just plain FUN and JOY are absolutely essential functions to a culture. (I have written extensively about this elsewhere on this blog.)

If we don’t think they’re essential, that says a lot about the dominant culture we’ve been steeped in — and explains a lot about why more of our community efforts don’t take off and thrive.

I can’t say for sure, because I’ve never seen a study on this and never done one. All I know is that I hear from a lot of people who are supposedly trying to build a community, but they don’t acknowledge the validity of anything other than basic survival functions.

Back to the topic of ableism: Not incidentally, an ableist mindset also marginalizes children and elders. A viable, healthy society not only allows but actually requires the full, valued participation of all of its members, from the very youngest to the very oldest.

Basically a roof over one’s head, growing food, and catching water. Basically a modern-day version of that dour-faced couple in the American Gothic painting. That’s their business, as long as they understand that a lot of people will not want to move onto rural acreage and try to endure life without art, music, storytelling, and just plain fun and joy. And civilization cannot survive, let alone progress, without those things.

Books vs car? No contest!

From a fellow author this morning on the feed of my deep Green book page:

People are paying $150 for pink Stanley cups and I’m over here asking 99 cents for my book smh #writerlife #writingcommunity #indieauthor

And my response:

Seriously! (And I’m going to have to Google to find out what a pink Stanley Cup is, because I thought a Stanley Cup was only if your NHL hockey team won the big tournament.)

Maybe it’s a cup version of a Stanley thermos. Which is awesome too, because I am all about reusable cups (instead of the disposable plastic cups which are so tacky and which everyone keeps using with such wild reckless abandon).

BTW I have one of those Stanley thermoses, super vintage and I got it for like five dollars at a yard sale and it works really great.

— But yeah, either way, the original post holds! Support your indie authors, buy their books!! A dollar spent on a book is a dollar spent on the collective knowledge and joy. I would even venture to say that a dollar spent on a book is a force multiplier out in the community.

I would even rather buy books than have a car. Books, and online classes, are two of the main things I spend money on instead of owning a car. I have never questioned that it is totally worth it!

(Yes, there are other major reasons I don’t want to own a car, but books and online classes and online conferences are some of the financial ones.)

Buying a new car is a drag

The actual comment that came across my feed was: “Buying a new car sucks *ss. Why do you have to sign so many papers?”

And my response:

Having to buy a car sucks, period.

I wish more places had good public transportation and safer ways to get around without having to take on the expense and stress of a owning a car.

(I myself do not own a car, but most of the people I know do, and they are always going through some sort of hassle. Car repairs, insurance, losing their cars to floods or other natural disasters, dealing with gasoline expenses etc.).

“Why don’t you live in an ecovillage yet?” — Part 2

In my first post under this title, a few days ago, I posted the original question as well as a link to the group where you can find lots of people’s answers to this topic.

Here’s mine, with a few exclusive additions for you who have found your way to this blog and been so kind as to read this far:

I prefer a neighborhood approach. Some of my neighbors are growing food and sharing seeds and things. Most of my neighbors do not collect rainwater yet, but I’m always promoting it and encouraging people to get started.

Also I educate people about solar cooking and passive solar cooling etc. For me it’s easier to try to create a more connected community in my own urban neighborhood than it would be to buy rural land and try to survive out there.

Plus, building from scratch has a high footprint, not only physical and financial but in terms of social capital as well.

I participate in efforts to protect rural land from development. And I support my local farmers by buying food from them and by helping them publicize their produce.

At my house I have two housemates and occasional guests. So the house itself is sort of a mini village. I provide extremely inexpensive, steady housing, and also have created space for emergency for refugees to stay here. And most recently, I created an extra sleeping spot in my little off-grid garage apartment for interns who want to come learn experientially about permaculture design and low-footprint, off-grid living.

Worthy of note is that even though I run my place as a low-footprint living laboratory, both of my housemates are “civilians” and both of them have continued to express that they are very happy staying here.

I have turned my garage into an off-grid mini “apartment” where I sleep and have my studio. (Not having a car is great because it gives me a whole extra building to use.)

There are a lot of empty houses in the USA. For some of us, it makes more sense to live in an existing house then to go out somewhere onto remote land and try to build everything from scratch.

Furthermore, my house has a public educational function.

As I’ve shared extensively in my Facebook posts, TikTok videos, and here on this blog, my house is on a corner lot and I have designed things to maximize the public education interface of my place.

So for example, we have the solar oven right next to the sidewalk where people can see it and smell food cooking; we have the little micro greens boxes next to the sidewalk where people can see them (and even pick if they like — though I don’t have a green thumb so things are a bit puny most of the time).

We have quite a few different types of native plants, and the site overall is an example of stormwater sponge and heat mitigation. We also have publicly visible rainwater collection, etc.

Furthermore, my place has elements of community in action, via my “porous property” at the corner. Several different types of benches where people can step off the sidewalk to sit in the shade or enjoy the sun. Many many people have expressed their appreciation of this amenity.

I also ran my little free library here for 10 years, although that is on hiatus right now while we are troubleshooting the persistent theft and vandalism that has suddenly become a problem in the past few months. At this point I am attributing it to a decline in foot traffic — either because some of the old steady users have moved away, or because some of those people got cars, etc. It doesn’t take much to make a shift in the chemistry balance of the social environment, for better or for worse.

Also, regarding a question posted by a friend/colleague, “How much land is required to grow all the food a household needs?”:

— Regarding growing all the food a household needs, many of us have decided that a better approach is to support local farmers. By supporting local farmers and growers, we widen our food-shed and weave a more resilient web of beneficial relationships that will stand the test of time. (Even if not every connection persists over time, the web as a whole is still in place. And able to keep growing.)

And, responding to a friend who has a great deal of plant knowledge but has a crushing work schedule, so there is an economic catch-22 at play when it comes to him maybe making a video or offering a workshop. (Even if we pay him.):

— Everything is a lot of work tho. Maybe there’s some other transmission pipeline that would be less work for you. I know you share my wish but this area would become more sustainable in terms of growing more of our own food right here locally.

I feel the same about YouTube videos , I do make them (TikTok also) but A) I have like seven followers; and B ) I don’t have four hands or my own personal videographer like a lot of people who make videos seem to — it’s a process.

Over the past few years of occupying my house, I have made it into a “Low-Footprint Living Laboratory” — kind of one big publicly visible “Uncle Milton’s Ant Farm,” which is “broadcasting” sustainability knowledge 24-7 in meatspace.

I take it as a testimonial to practicality that my two “civilian” housemates have managed to continue to put up with living here. <laugh emojis>

And regarding another person’s question, about why the costs aren’t lower in ecovillages:

— It seems like it should be more affordable, yes. Since people are pooling costs.

But I think because people build new buildings instead of using existing buildings, and also since a lot of people go out in the country they have to build new infrastructure instead of using what’s already existing. So I think that’s one factor that drives up the cost.

There can also be a lot of legal expenses involved when people try to buy one piece of land together.

I live in a small city and I consider my house a micro-village. We have three people living here, plus occasional guests, and we share expenses and help each other.

Also, a lot of neighbors are trying to build more connections in the neighborhood, sharing resources and helping each other. And we work together to try to promote sustainable actions by our local government.
It is not an official ecovillage but that is my intent.

And — My reply to a perennial city-hater who thinks that cities are doomed, no one should live in cities, etc.:

— I share your frustration, but ultimately I do not believe the consumption and paving will continue unabated.

A lot of cities are re-introducing nature, and de-paving large areas, And expanding native plants and food-growing areas, and so on. The Nature of Cities Festival is one organization/annual conference that has been highlighting and amplifying such necessary efforts.

And, that said, not everyone wants to live in a city. And no one has to!

But if all of us city dwellers were to move out to rural areas, the rural areas would become very crowded and resource-burdened, and I’m sure you rural-dwellers would not want that.