Winter knit slipper-bootie repair!

Successful stitching experiment today: Fixed the sole of my left slipper.

These knitted bootie slippers are so super warm. There’s even a layer of foam padding inside the sole to add to the insulating powers.

But the rubber sole of the left one had gotten tattered in the front and started to get tattered in the back as well. (Sorry did not think to post the Before picture before starting into the project. I really should get better about posting Before pictures.)

Rather than rip off all the rubber, I just covered it over. I used what was on hand in my scrap bag, none of which was a piece big enough to cover the whole thing.

But I turned that into an asset. By using three different types of material, it’s kind of a research project as I will get to observe which type of material wears better.

BTW these booties were old when I got them, a couple of years ago. I actually rescued them from the waste stream. My guess is that they got discarded because one part of the upper of one boot had become unstitched from the sole.

But I was able to mend that gap pretty easily and have been enjoying the booties in cold weather all this time. Til recently the sole of the left one started to wear out.

My motive for taking the trouble to make these repairs? For sure, I am thrifty and love to not have to spend money on buying new stuff. I have so much better things to spend money on, like books and online classes!! And good food!

But even more, I do it because I love rescuing things that are still good, and giving them a long long life beyond what they were going to have. And keeping things out of landfill is always a worthy endeavor.

And, another aspect I really enjoy is adding my own distinctive touches when I mend things. Instant one-of-a-kind designer fashion!! <laugh emoji, green heart emoji>

See pics here on my DEEP GREEN Facebook page.

Enough anti-Trump memes already??

“Why do so many Christians follow the most anti-Christ person on the planet? Explain it to me like I’m two years old.” (Typical meme seen on the page of fellow Boomer who identify as liberal.)

This is an example of a type of meme that has been going around a lot. Us Boomer liberals bashing Trump, Republicans, etc.

Asking these kinds of questions in an echo chamber of fellow “liberals” can give a nice burst of feeling righteous. But a better approach, when we’re triggered by the “badness” of “the other,” is to go inward, work on ourselves, do shadow work.

Another aspect has to do with attention. When so much of our attention is tied up in self-righteousness about how “bad” the “bad guy” is, we have that much less attention and creativity available to actually effect positive change.

I wish more of us self-described “liberals” of the Boomer generation would put our attention on supporting actual progressive candidates. Then we wouldn’t have to be obsessing about whatever the “bad guy” or “bad party” is doing.

(It was also pointed out to me that Biden has done a lot of really good things. Maybe if more of Biden’s supporters would publicize some of the good things he’s accomplished, more of voters could get behind him and really vote enthusiastically, as opposed to just voting against the other guy.)

PS. Also I can see how this kind of meme comes across as bashing Christians, and I can see how a lot of Christians might be feeling sort of harassed by secular “liberals” these days.

More thoughts for the “anti-city” faction

Regarding the seemingly endless “cities versus rural” debate, I actually think both sides are correct.

I actually think we will be converging toward more of a village/small city pattern as was prevalent in days bygone. Towns/villages/small cities surrounded by rural land.

Right now, most rural areas (at least here in the USA) are too desolate and empty to be sustainable. They are totally car-dependent, and do not have enough social or economic diversity for most people to even want to live there, even if they could.

I would not want anyone to have to grow old by themselves out on rural land. I would not want any child to have to grow up by themselves with just their parents out on rural land. I would not want anybody working age to have to try to find a livelihood, and find a mate while living alone out on rural land.

Those of you who love rural living and extol its virtues, please feel free to move out to the country. But be careful what you wish for when you talk about millions of us city-dwellers being unsustainable. I don’t really think you want us to all move out into the country, as we will wreck your pastoral idyll. And I hope you’re not hoping that a bunch of us will just die or commit suicide.

Throughout history, there has always been an interplay, a rich web of social and economic beneficial relationships between towns and farms. I do not expect that pattern to stop. It may be the most durable settlement pattern. Some of the most livable and sustainable places are those where this pattern is still that way, and has been in place for thousands of years. I’m thinking of many parts of England, Europe, Africa, and Asia.

Regarding the critique about not being able to have chickens, and the comment about concentrated pollution and other “bad” aspects of cities.

In many cities, people have chickens. and people grow food, and people have compost. Etc. etc.

There is a persistent misconception in sustainability/permie/Deep Adaptation circles that every single household has to grow each and every bit of its own food. Which may be why a lot of people think that cities are unsustainable.

Some foods are best grown cooperatively, such as calorie crops such as nuts and potatoes. Those are nicely grown in a food forest, which could be at the block scale, neighborhood scale, or even possibly small city wide scale.

I’m not saying that people shouldn’t move out to the country if they want to. But nobody should be forced to move out to the country either.

And, rural areas simply would not be able to absorb billions of people suddenly moving out of cities, even if we wanted to, which probably most of us don’t.

Regarding the “CAFO” comment, those so-called nasty functions are jobs. Livelihoods that support people.

Transporting produce into a city is a job that pays people.

Transporting waste out of a city (or better yet, turning “waste” into a resource by deploying it within the city to areas that can use it) is a job that can be a livelihood for people.

And so on.

Everything that can be said about cities being unsustainable because of dependency on fossil fuels, is equally true of rural areas right now. Rural areas too are far too dependent on fossil fuels.

An extremely damaging aspect of the “move out to the country” meme, that is not enough talked about, is the number of people who don’t know a thing about farming or growing, and suddenly they just move out from their city home or suburban home onto acreage, hire a land-clearing company, totally demolish the soil biology, and build an entire new house. Now tell me that’s not a totally unsustainable, dare I say consumerist, squandering of resources.

We are perpetrating over and over again the rapacious colonizer mindset that brought us to this terrible point we’ve reached.

This brings me to mind some words I heard awhile back, attributed to Ianto Evans, from Cobb Cottage/Aprovecho Research Center up in Oregon. A student was expressing enthusiasm that she and her colleagues were going to be “breaking ground on a new Ecovillage soon.” To which Evans supposedly responded in horror, “Please, don’t break any new ground! There’s already been enough ground broken!”

Never mind the gentrification this entails. The displacement of multi generational farming families and other people who actually historically live in those rural areas.

Regarding the critique that cities are dependent on fossil-fuel infrastructure …

For sure the fossil-fuel infrastructure
Infrastructure is there yes, but rural areas are also extremely entrenched in fossil-fuel infrastructure.

And — for those of us who prefer to be more resilient, there are many ways to basically live off-grid in a city.

A person/household can reduce their electricity dependency to basically just charging their phone or other essential work device.

A person can collect enough rainwater to meet their entire household needs, even though of course in cities the houses are generally hooked up to city water. And so on.

The solution isn’t to smash all the cities. And the solution isn’t to get rid of rural areas either. The solution is to reduce our dependency on energy from industrial and centralized sources.

I’m doing that in the city where I live. Other people I know are doing that in suburban areas where they live, or in the rural areas where they live.

We are all actually working toward aligned goals.

Interdependence is the keyword.

I actually think at least some of these people who are on some kind of “Green Acres /Ringing Cedars” trip, would actually be just as happy to stay put in their urban houses if they could just have chickens and grow a garden. And collect rainwater, and have compost. But for one thing, this actually is not illegal in most places. And for another thing, even in the places where it is illegal, the solution is to join forces with your neighbors and meet with your local city officials to get the immoral and unsustainable ordinances changed — not ditch your whole house you’ve spent years getting how you wanted it, and bail on your community you’ve spent years in, and move out to the boonies.

Another hypothesis I have is that some of the rural evangelists are actually having sour grapes because they miss the community and joy and arts and so on of the city. so they want us to move out there and be desolate and miserable with them. Whereas instead, if they truly prefer rural settings, but just miss the arts and music and community, they could be working to introduce music and arts and community there. Like, get with the oldtime locals who play music together. Or start an open mic in the nearby town or something.

Maybe some of their friends and family would even want to join them out there if something more than just grubbing for potatoes like some modern version of the American Gothic painting were on offer (or stockpiling ammo and hoarding two years’ worth of C-rations, if the Doomer/Prepper version is more your flavor).

“The main problem with keeping cities is the disconnection they create between people and Nature.”

— Regarding this comment:

— it should be emphasized that it is industrial cities that have this disconnection. Traditional cities, there is much, much more connection between people and nature than most of us born & raised in industrialized, consumerist countries might realize.

Traditional cities have much less pavement. I like what you said about letting the infrastructure go. I would be all for letting pipes degrade and just progressing toward full-on rainwater collection and sharing.

And letting most side streets crumble. BTW some cities have begun “de-paving” — Actually turning large asphalt roads back into dirt roads or mulched paths.

On the connection with nature note … Old cities in Greece and Italy, and Eastern Europe, I have seen lots of pictures of people with livestock. Herding sheep and other livestock in a very densely settled village or town or small city (something much more densely settled than we have in the industrialized world).

While I don’t recommend James Bond movies as your sole source of sustainability studies, I did see, while watching a movie on cable TV with my family over the holidays, a large garage-like or warehouse-like space in an ancient Italian village, where a few dozen sheep were being kept. The shepherd was just getting ready to let the sheep out of the garage (presumably to escort them to pasture outside the city walls) when Agent 007’s superduper supersonic car sped by.

They didn’t invent this scenario out of the blue just for the James Bond movie; rather, they included this detail for verisimilitude of the ancient European citadel setting.

It strikes me, as I’ve been writing down all these musings, that some of us will be engaged in the work of “town-ifying” the rural areas, to retrofit the social and economic diversity, and other community elements, that will make these areas once again livable; while others of us will be involved in the work of retrofitting more “rural/village” aspects back into the towns and cities to make these densely settled areas once again livable. More about that in a future post.

“Brain drain”; city slickers

The main thing that concerns me is a persistent tendency of the “rural is THE ONLY WAY” people to want to bash cities and somehow make cities be completely gone.

If you don’t like us, then don’t sell us any food, and we will starve, or else we will grow our own. Or else sell us food at high prices and make a nice pile of money off of us. Then maybe you won’t hate us so much.
Either way, we won’t be your problem.

City people living in cities are probably doing a lot less damage than ignorant city people moving out to the country and mowing an entire acre (or two, or seven), felling every tree in sight, arrogantly refusing to join existing networks of farmers and growers, refusing to respect the existing economy, tearing down old houses and constructing huge new houses, etc.

I have been horrified at the stories I’ve heard from city people who think they’re doing such a great thing by moving out to the country. So many of them are causing so much damage.

And I didn’t even mention the long commutes, clogged roads because so many of them refuse to give up their city jobs and just move fully out to the country.

Oh, and then there are the people who move out to the country when they’re getting way too old to just start farming when they’ve never farmed in their lives, and then they are 70 or 80 or 90 years old living by themselves out on remote acreage, and their kids have to figure out how to take care of them.

And the new rural transplant residents expecting high-quality hospitals and home care services for nine dollars an hour, etc. etc. don’t get me started.

Rural areas as they are right now are every bit as problematic as cities as they are right now. Both of them need massive retrofits. Both of them need massive behavior changes. And both can and must change.

Or, we can all just give up and roll over and die, as one of my favorite Permaculture teachers was fond of saying tongue in cheek.

PS. Another thing I didn’t mention is the brain drain from people thinking they need to go move out to the country and spend their entire day grubbing potatoes. So whatever creative skills and knowledge and whatever they’ve learned just goes down the drain and is not used to design the creative solutions that we need to be putting our heads together to design.

BTW, I love potatoes and have grown them and grow sweet potatoes and grow other vegetables as well. Farm work is beautiful and honorable. I have worked on farms, I have worked in community gardens, and I have grown food in my own yard. And I have encouraged all of my neighbors to grow food and collect rainwater and cook with the sun, all of which I do. So this is no disparagement of growing potatoes or growing any other food. The fact is that all of us will need to become more involved in the growing of food.

It’s just that some of us will be in towns, some of us will be in suburbs, and some of us, yes, will be out in the country. and I really think all types of human settlements are going to be converging more toward a village model. A city is actually a collection of villages that ended up growing to the point that they merged together. There’s going to be some retrofit adjustment there as well.

PS. If you want to follow along this discussion, and maybe contribute some thoughts of your own, join the group Degrowth – join the revolution, and then type into the search field “Phase out the use of flush toilets”; that should bring up the post.

The death of passenger rail: Boomers, How did we let this happen?

Came across my feed the other day: Most people in the US underestimate high-speed rail. There’s a direct train from Barcelona to Paris that takes 6 hours, tops out at almost 200 mph, and costs $41. Not $400+. $41. Why aren’t we funding this?

Hey, even just restoring the regular rail service we used to have in more places would be a step up! Intercity bus service too.

But people have to want it enough to put their money where their mouth is. For example, start choosing trains over flying. I think if enough of my fellow Boomers did this we might start a wave!

FWIW The only long-distance trip I do regularly anymore is by train, to see my family over the winter holidays.

Added later: It’s too bad such a majority of us Boomers — including even the “Earth Day/Woodstock hippie” subset of Boomers — opted to spend our working years in suburban sprawl housing, car-centered life, even though we ourselves had the benefit of growing up in walkable neighborhoods served by public transportation.

Even our suburbs back when we were growing up were a lot more walkable and served by public transportation. Smaller yards smaller lots, more closely connected neighbors.

Why did we ever choose to give that up when we had the choice when we were starting to raise our families??? (I myself did not choose to give that up. But so many did. We basically voted against public transportation at a time of our lives when we should have been doubling down. I mean, we “Woodstock Boomers” were all about Earth Day and all that, right? What the heck happened?)

Do you have any thoughts on this?

One fellow Boomer said “Reagan and the 80s came along.”

Indeed … but I am wondering why and how exactly… How did we consent to trade so much wonderfulness for such a yucky zeitgeist. Wall St., Gordon Gekko, etc.

I’m guessing that we allowed ourselves to get dazzled by financial affluence — to the point where we came to devalue the very deep, and much more flexible and valuable, social affluence that we had.

From a friend: Our generation sold out. I talk with young people who understand protecting the environment, while they don’t even know first-hand how “normal” (climate/temp-wise) and pristine things used to be. I usually apologize to them that my generation “dropped the ball.”

And my reply: Fortunately there is still a lot we can do, we may not save anything but we can at least ease a lot of suffering and soften people’s landing. And thank you for being one of the ones who get it!!

Clearing and mulching 2.5 acres? Please don’t!!

To the person in the Florida Permaculture Community FB group who was asking about clearing 2.5 acres. (I can’t seem to find the post to reply to it.) They said they got a quote from a land-clearing company that sounded extremely high.

My take: Please, PLEASE do not mulch and clear 2.5 entire acres. The good news is, you don’t need to go to that expense.

One of the design principles of permaculture is to start small. Not only is it the right thing to do for ecosystems, it is sensible for our wallets and our own personal energy.

You will also be able to get necessary feedback by observing and interacting with your new place. There are many plants on such a large area that will surely be helpful, medicinal, and even be nurse plants that will help your fruit trees grow. That’s like money in the bank!

I would leave the land as is for now, until you are ready to actually live there. Plant some trees at the house where you live now, so you can keep a better eye on them.

Even after you do move to your land, start very very small. Maybe just clear enough for a tiny house and five or 10 trees. And you’ll be able to do that yourself, by hand (maybe with the help of some friends, sort of a fun workday), and you’ll be able to get to know the land much better in the process.

Tagging people who have extensive experience setting up food forests, while building/protecting the soil-food web and local ecology. Koreen Brennan Jungle Jay Hardman Andy Firk Transforming Florida Yards

PS. A lot of people are not willing to invest the money in taking a Permaculture design certificate course. However, the thousand dollars for tuition will more than pay for itself, usually rather quickly. (And actually, a lot of reputable PDCs are now being offered for free or nearly free, so even money is not an excuse anymore. The offerings include many excellent online options, so geography is not the barrier it used to be either.) As evidenced by this example here, Where somebody was totally ready to spend probably $10,000 or $20,000 to totally denude a piece of land. (Stripping it of its soil biology, Or at least highly disrupting the soil biology, in the process. That’s another thing we study in Permaculture courses.)

Jumping into a Permaculture group on Facebook and asking questions might seem cheap and easy, but it is often a false economy. Interacting in community is great but it’s not a substitute for actually getting to learn the tools, principles, and ethics.

(***Image for visial attention; includes my screenshot of a piece of a land-clearing company ad; accompanied by my emoji reaction. Not that clearing and tree removal, and mechanized equipment, are not useful sometimes, but we as permies need to be extremely discerning.)

“It’s not the same”

If I had a dime for every time I’ve heard somebody say this, regarding virtual conferences, zoom meetings, etc.

And you’re right, it’s not the same. It’s not the same as face-to-face.

However, there are trade-offs.

• Not having to pay for gasoline, hotels, out-of-town restaurant meals.

• I don’t know about you, but I find that the signal-to-noise ratio is vastly boosted by the reduced distractions of virtual convening. In-person meetings can leave a person feeling overstimulated and distracted.

• On a related note, this is something that often comes up at a conference or retreat. The atmosphere is very concentrated and intense in terms of learning, and that can result in an intense emotional bonding with our fellow participants. The can be beautiful, but they can also be a lot of emotional fallout. I have many times seen people fall into intimacies that would best have been kept platonic/collegial rather than physical, and have often been one of those people. Virtual conferences offer a way to meet people, and if there is meant to be deeper intimacy, the individuals can then, after the conference, correspond and arrange it. But there is a safety buffer of geography.

• Having an electronic means of transmitting contact info, and other info, by text right there on the spot, via the Comments section of Zoom or other conferencing app. No more arriving home with a suitcase (or backpack) full of scrap paper, business cards, etc. Hey, maybe you’re more organized than I am, but I suspect I’m not the only one who finds great relief in immediate, paperless, easily retrievable info-sharing.

• On a somewhat related note, I noticed that the “postconference crash” or “emotional hangover,” or whatever you want to call it, from a virtual conference is almost zero. Whereas I have had some severe emotional hangovers, post-crashes after returning home from physical conferences, retreats, convergences. It seems to be accentuated the more geographic distance there is. With meetings at the local or bioregional level (as opposed to in-person conferences that draw from a wide area), somehow I end up staying more grounded, knowing that we will realistically be able to keep in touch and build real community over time. (This is my experience; your mileage may vary. But I often find that when I describe my experience, it turns out that more people feel the same way than I had expected. And I have not only experienced this as a participant, but also witnessed it as a teacher, instructor, or leader — That a lot of people crash once they get home.) Otherwise — this may sound counterintuitive, but — I think we are better off meeting virtually if we’re going to be meeting with people who live in geographically scattered locations.

• Being able to interact with, learn from people who might not have the means to come to an in-person conference. I’ve met people from Kenya to Kazakhstan to Chile to Canada, and lots of places in between.

• Scheduling too, people from so many countries might not be able to drop everything to come to one conference that’s happening at one time. But meeting online increases the odds of being compatible with more people’s schedules. Yesterday’s Water Stories webinar I attended (Water Retention Earthworks Success Stories) seemed to have dozens or possibly even hundreds of attendees, from all over the world. The presenters were based in Chile, and offered truly invaluable knowledge with detailed illustrations and footage.

• Being able to implement what you’ve learned immediately, on the spot, in your household and neighborhood and community. No jet lag — either literal or mental.

• And of course, for all of us who care about eco-footprint and walking our talk, there is no contest. Virtual for the win! This is really key in particular for those of us who identify as environmental professionals. We need to walk our talk.

• And finally, germ exposure. With or without Covid, viral transmission is a major concern and is not going to become any less of a thing as years go by. My personal preference is to limit indoor spaces, and build a bit of immunity with some exposure to indoor spaces locally at selected times. Priorities and tradeoffs! Like, I don’t need to be present at city commission meetings indoors so much. Nothing I have to say is that important that I can’t make a video or write an email. And I adore my city officials, but fortunately we can get face-to-face contact via outdoor public community events. But, when a friend of mine is getting a community award, I am willing to risk a bit of indoor time to honor her.

To be sure: Face-to-face contact is necessary for humans, as it is for all other primates. Fortunately, face-to-face contact is available literally all around us. And many of us are deficient in the area of knowing our neighbors. If you need more face-to-face contact, go outside. You can start with something as simple as just saying hello to somebody as they are walking by walking their dog. I know this may sound dismissive, but this is a life-and-death issue for our society right now. We are deficient in face-to-face contact. And in-person conferences are not the way to solve that deficiency.

Another thing you could do, that I think a lot of people don’t think to do, is gather a bunch of your local community members in one place, such as a roofed pavilion or your open-air living room, with a wide-screen TV (or sheet + projector, or laptop computer), and attend a virtual conference together.

As the Flight Free Movement — a wonderful movement which seems to be led largely by academics who have seen the light — has taught me, there’s a lot of gatekeeping and ego in academia and other professions that makes people think they need to travel to glamorous conferences overseas. So, handling that set of emotions and beliefs is a key part of weaning ourselves off of the compulsion to travel to things that are best partaken right at home.

All of that said, every bioregion these days abounds and opportunities to get together in person, outdoors, to experientially learn things such as planting, harvesting, earthworks, rainwater collection. I do strongly encourage everybody so inclined to carpool, walk, bicycle to those opportunities in your home region.

PS. Right after I posted this blog post, I was able to partake of a video that was an invaluable review for my Certified End-of-Life Doula training. Which I took online, in 2023. Since a lot of you have expressed interest in training for hospice doula/end-of-life Doula, I am sharing the link here to Suzanne O’Brien’s YouTube channel. Suzanne is an amazing instructor — super knowledgeable and experienced, kind, down-to-earth, and a great inspiration. With the CEOLD training, I have already been able to help multiple friends and neighbors as they and their families have gone through the end-of-life passage.

Reading list for a collapse/adaptation study group

Someone in the Deep Adaptation group is starting a study group in their community. And asked for recommendations of books and other texts.

They mentioned they are interested in both fiction and nonfiction (very wise, in my experience — fiction can convey a lot of deep truth), and books as well as other media.

I am pasting here some of the recommendations that people mentioned in the comments. I will add to this list as I come across more recommendations.

Here are some titles one member recommended; I will try to dig up the authors etc. as time permits.

•Breaking Together
• Another End of the World is Possible
• On Freedom (Maggie Nelson)
• We’re Doomed Now What?
• Climate Wars
• Deep Green Resistance
• The Resilience Imperative
• Mossbacks

• Michael Dowd’s “Post Doom” series includes both audio and written works. https://postdoom.com/

• Carolyn Baker’s books Undaunted and Love in the Age of Ecological Apocalypse. As the DA member who recommended these so aptly puts it, “I don’t need the science anymore. I need to figure out how to be.” Carolyn Baker has YouTube interviews also.

• I also recommend Eye of the Storm: Facing Climate and Social Chaos, by Terry LePage, who is a member of the Deep Adaptation group. (BTW Terry is hosting a zoom book club for the book starting this Saturday January 13, 2024. Check the Deep Adaptation group for details and sign up. Hope to see you there!)

CULTIVATING COMPASSION

To the many excellent recommendations that others have suggested, I would very strongly recommend some reading about cultivating compassion.

I gave this topic a whole header by itself. Because, in my experience, compassion is the ultimate adaptive trait for a society, and for individuals.

Here is an excellent short compilation that gives great practical tips for everyday people on how to cultivate compassion. How To Be a Bodhisattva https://www.lionsroar.com/how-to-be-a-bodhisattva-2/ (Thich Nhat Hanh; Lion’s Roar)

HOW TO BE A BODHISATTVA
It may seem like an unattainable ideal, but you can start right now as a bodhisattva-in-training. All you need is the aspiration to put others first.
THICH NHAT HANH
14 MARCH 2023

  • Everyone Is Your Guest
    Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche on your life as a future bodhisattva
  • 6 Baby Steps to Kindness
    The path of compassion, says Judy Lief, starts with stepping out of your usual storyline. Here are five ways to do it.
  • You Deserve Compassion Too
    Compassion makes no distinction between self and other, says Christina Feldman. Care for your own suffering in the same way you care for others’.
  • The Buddha’s Love
    Thich Nhat Hanh describes how love for one person becomes love for all.
  • Unbearable Compassion
    For our compassion to be effective, says Ogyen Trinley Dorje, the 17th Karmapa, it must be as unbearable as the world’s suffering is.
  • Toward a Culture of Love
    Love is the ultimate transgression, bell hooks argues. Its transformative power can shatter the status quo.

compassion, bodhisattva