The next-best time

When it comes to things we regret not starting sooner … The best time was always five or 10 or 20 or 40 or however many years ago.

But the next-best time is now.

The saying “Don’t cry over spilt milk” exists for a reason.

I’m not going to tell you don’t cry. I myself cry all the time over various flavors of spilt milk, both in my personal life and as an activist. (Not that I can ever entirely separate those two, but.) There are some really very sad regrets for missed chances and lost time. And a good cry can be a necessary part of moving forward.

But then, we have to get busy right now. Planting trees, learning skills, owning a transgression, making amends to the planet and to fellow human beings, learning a better way, picking up dropped threads of old conversations. Speaking up about something we needed to speak up about a long time ago.

Until someone invents a time-machine where we can go back and have a do-over — which I’m really not sure we want, because wouldn’t different people then be having different do-overs of different stuff, and wouldn’t that take a lot of additional time, and result in many tangled threads in the space-time continuum? — our best option is right now.

Creating Degrowth discussion space that is not patriarchical

A member of the Degrowth group made a post asking if other women would be interested in this, as women (and I would also add nonbinary folk) have some concerns regarding the realities of climate change and adaptation and degrowth that are not necessarily shared by men.

A few thoughts I shared:

(In response to the OP):

Thank you for this post. I have often enjoyed and appreciated what you share in this group.

On a personal note: I dropped out of the middle class in the early 2000s to follow my calling as artist/activist. And I identify with the women in this thread who have said they have lots of skills but that those skills are not valued in the capitalist economy.

My departure from the “professional middle-class office job” path was a contributing factor in me drifting apart — both geographically and otherwise — from my family of origin for some years. I’m doing my best to plan for an old age which may not include the comforts of family.

It’s been an uncomfortable sensation having one foot in the “old economy” while living a Degrowth activist life to the best of my abilities. Because I chose this path, instead of choosing the more financially well to do “office professional with a retirement fund and health insurance” path that my siblings & I were raised to pursue, I feel an obligation to do everything I can to not be a financial burden on my siblings.

Also I have lifelong mental health issues which were at one time labeled by “authority figures” as being a problem child and being selfish. For most of my life I bought into this myself and just thought of myself as not a very good person. I have largely overcome a lot of the baggage about this, but it still is a factor in some of my interactions.

Financially … One struggle I’ve always had is that many of the things we can do to be frugal and make ends meet on a low income, are disparaged and even made illegal by “the authorities.”

It’s stressful to be trying to implement Degrowth and deep adaptation, but have to be worried that — for example — code enforcement is going to find our yards too messy and write us up and have the right to fine us.

(And of course there is the weight of the social disapproval that comes in addition to any official restrictions. Like, it’s even exhausting dealing with people’s condescending attitudes toward my choice of walking and bicycle and bus as transportation, instead of owning an automobile. I mix with a lot of people in higher economic brackets, as part of my activism, and this can definitely add just an extra layer of emotional wear and tear.) 

Or if we try to share our house with too many people, we could become a target of classist rules and regulations limiting the number of unrelated people who can live together.

I am concerned about housing; there is a homelessness crisis in our area as in many other places. And a lot of xenophobia, so most people aren’t exactly talking about how we’re going to need to open our hearts and our borders to people from deep crisis areas.

I don’t have kids, and only spent a very little time helping a parent who needed care, so I have it a lot easier than a lot of others who have spoken in this thread. Mainly I just have an activist’s sense of responsibility for the well-being of future generations, and also my own older generation.

And I simply love our world and universe, and feel a yearning and an obligation to make it a comfortable and loving place for everybody. All people, and all species.

On a societal/Degrowth/Deep Adaptation note:

Over the past few years, as I’ve been learning about, and attempting to practice, anti-racism and decolonization work, I’ve come to realize that decolonization and antiracism needs to be at the core of Degrowth & Deep Adaptation.

I went to see a film called Origin recently. It explained a lot about the relationship between racism, sexism, and other elements of what is basically a worldwide caste system.

(Following is from the Wikipedia entry for the film):

“Origin is a 2023 American biographical drama film written and directed by Ava DuVernay. It is based on the life of Isabel Wilkerson, played by Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor, as she writes the book Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents. Over the course of the film, Wilkerson travels throughout Germany, India, and the United States to research the caste systems in each country’s history.”

(The following is from the Amazon listing of the book Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents; by Dr. Isabel Wilkerson):

“The Pulitzer Prize–winning, bestselling author of The Warmth of Other Suns examines the unspoken caste system that has shaped America and shows how our lives today are still defined by a hierarchy of human divisions — now with a new Afterword by the author.”

To the men who are feeling defensive about this thread, I can somewhat relate to your feelings. It’s how I felt when I first started tuning in to Black and Indigenous spaces on social media. Where white people are invited to listen, but not to comment. Listening to peoples’ experiences, really taking it in without commenting — and just sitting with the discomfort if it comes up — was and continues to be a huge factor in my growth as an activist and a human.

(In response to one of the men who jumped into the discussion, citing an article that debunks Origin, a film I had recommended he check out, based on a comment he made):

In the article, he claims that Wilkerson likens caste to race. That is not the case. Rather, Dr. Wilkerson came, through her research, to see race as an aspect of a caste-like hierarchy (a hierarchy that she wasn’t suggesting is literally the same as India’s caste system).

Another misunderstanding by the article’s author is that race is binary.

“…no group in India, however low, lacks a group beneath them that lets them feel purer. This is very different from the exclusionary logic of race, which is binary (black versus white) and lacks any cosmological basis for one black person to feel racially superior to another black.”

In fact, there is discrimination among Black people. There is colorism, as well as class discrimination. It’s really a huge thing. All you have to do is listen to the experiences of Black women talking on social media, you will quickly see how colorism (lighter-skinned Black people being seen as higher in the hierarchy than darker-skinned Black people) affects every aspect of life for a Black person, including professional advancement, dating & marriage etc.

Among those of us in what we call the “Caucasian” category, we too always have someone we can look down on. In my dad’s hometown, the Slavic immigrants were looked down on even though we were just as pale As USA born people. Language made a kind of caste; if you couldn’t speak English, you were in a lower class. The Irish spoke English but they spoke it with an accent so they were higher in the hierarchy than the Slavs, but lower than the USA born English speakers. And then in the same town we had the Italian immigrants. They were not Black, and yet they were looked down on both because they spoke a different language and because they were darker skin and dark haired.

Examples of a caste like hierarchy can be seen in terms of profession, accent, body type – tall and thin is considered superior – and many other attributes.

Oh and then let’s get into the hierarchy wherein indigenous ways are viewed as “primitive.” Indigenous ways of building, indigenous ways of growing food, indigenous ways of governance.While industrial colonizer ways are trashing rainforests, waging trillion-dollar warfare, and leading to the extinction of ancient wisdom that may be the biosphere’s only hope.

Basically it all boils down to colonialism.

BTW [OP] I hope you are OK with me bringing this up here, it’s a bit off your thread topic which was to create a women-only discussion. I feel it’s important because it might help raise understanding among some of the men who have chosen to join this thread despite your clear wording of your post. But I will delete if necessary/preferable. And thank you again for starting this thread!

(In regard to hurtful styles of communication that tend to pop up in groups dominated by us Anglo-European people):

There are certain patterns of communication that I associate with patriarchy (not men per se, but PATRIARCHY) and with white-supremacy culture.

One of them is to respond with derision / invalidation to what someone says.

For example, one guy just typed OMG in response to this post. 

Another is to ask for documentation and examples in response to somebody speaking from the heart about what they are feeling or experiencing.

Although most groups have rules against bullying, it’s so woven into the dominant culture that it would be a full-time job trying to really eliminate bullying and invalidation from every comment. It’s like it’s so baked into us that we don’t even hear ourselves.

Hard to eliminate… But I am definitely working on it!

Another pattern is the compulsive need to debate. Not everything has to or should be about debating. It’s not about winning arguments; we are here to shape a culture that is just, equitable, and nurturing. The culture that is killing the biosphere is also killing our souls. We have the option to evolve, and I think it will be more by listening and empathizing rather than by debating and being in our heads.

Good article on doing Degrowth

Someone in the Degrowth group posted a good article from resilience.org. It goes into some of what the actual nuts and bolts of Degrowth would mean for everyday people, and how we can move forward with doing it.

I find the resilience.org article very helpful; it even talks about ways of introducing degrowth to “mainstream” people. There’s a link to the article at the end of this post.

A quote from the article that stood out right away for me:

“… many well-intentioned good green people do not understand the magnitude of the global predicament and therefore they seriously underestimate the change that is needed. Many assume that reforms to the present system will suffice to enable a just and sustainable world, but there is a very strong case that this is quite mistaken. A study I carried out took common Footprint and related figures and derived the conclusion that if the world’s 2050 expected population were to share natural resources equally we would all receive about one-ninth of the per capita amount we in rich countries get now …”

Yes. This is consistent with what I’ve read from some other sources that made sense to me. 90% reduction is the figure we’ve been working with in the Riot for Austerity (the movement that formed the nucleus for my book DEEP GREEN, and for this blog).

The actual figure mentioned by Monbiot in his book HEAT is that we need to cut consumption by 94% of the USA average. But the grassroots Riot movement inspired by his book adopted 90% as an easy round number and a worthy benchmark to aim for.

A few critiques of the article:

— One harmful, widespread misconception is that living in small decentralized communities means having to leave our existing, already-built homes in existing neighborhoods, move out to the country or wilderness and build new buildings. This is way too much work and energy consumption, not only physical and fossil but also social energy. Social capital has embodied energy too.

It’s possible to start living almost off-grid even in a conventional neighborhood. Staying plugged into the existing systems as regulations require, but not having to use them much or depend on them. My electricity usage is about 2% of the average US residents. And water usage about 5% or 10% of the USA average. Regulations require that I be hooked up to water and electricity, but there are no regulations that forbid also collecting our own rainwater, and no regulations against conserving water and electricity.

And, cities and neighborhoods reduce dependency on the private automobile. Many of us find we can do without car ownership altogether.

Neighbors have differing degrees of interest in the concept of forming sustainable community, but as this article in the original post points out, there are many angles we can use nowadays to draw people in to Degrowth ways of life. A lot of the strongest enticements nowadays are economic struggle, or natural-disaster preparedness, or distrust of government.

I’ve never tried this but I may start asking people, “what if a neighborhood basically had its own mini government that was set up by the residents to serve all the needs of the people in the neighborhood?”

The photo they use as an illustration is not one that I find helpful, as I feel it reinforces the stereotype, within green/degrowth/eco circles, of living a romantic bucolic life alone out in the middle of the woods, when that is the exact opposite of what’s desirable and needed for most.

As I commented to someone in the Degrowth group who was feeling discouraged because he’s living in the city and cannot move out to an ecovillage:

It’s possible to live in a city and be basically almost entirely off grid in terms of consumption. That’s what I do, and it sounds like you are doing similar.

Yes, we are hooked up to electricity and water and all that. But, we can radically reduce our consumption so that we basically are living at a Degrowth level. As the article points out, there are getting to be more enticements for everyday people to look at this lifestyle. Economic struggle, increasingly prevalent natural disasters, distrust in government – all make it more attractive to start unhooking from systems even if we cannot completely be off the grid. And, living in existing cities and neighborhoods can make it easier to form/strengthen the very necessary social grids.

Enough manufactured goods exist, in people’s garages and in the waste-stream, to meet our needs indefinitely while we relearn how to meet our needs without mass manufacturing. Clothing is one example of manufactured goods in major over-supply. We may be mining the landfills for decades or centuries to come.

People keep saying that we can’t live a sustainable lifestyle on a planet of 8 billion.

But, since 8 billion people are already here, and I am one of the ones born & raised in the high-footprint countries, I feel that my most ethical option as a citizen of the rich industrialized world is to reduce my consumption to 1/10 of the USA average, and encourage my peers to do the same.

The article mentions 1/9 as a benchmark. These are good targets to aim for. It may not be easy or possible within the current system for a person to reduce, for example, their gasoline usage to 1/9 or 1/10 of the average USA resident’s.

But many of us involved in this movement have done so. Same with electricity, water usage, purchase of consumer goods. And also, unhooking our finances and banking from the growth economy to the extent possible.

And finally, on the subject of welcoming our hearts, and borders, to people fleeing the chaos that we in the “rich world” have caused …

I live in a tourist town, and we pride ourselves on welcoming 10 million tourists a year or something like that. If we can welcome 10 million tourists then we should be able to welcome 10 million refugees, and I’m prepared to do my part. I currently share my small house with two housemates, but during special-event weeks we have had 11 or 12 people sleeping here. If it’s possible during tourist season, it’s possible anytime!

Added later: As a step toward neighborhood-based governance, and weaning ourselves off of dependence on centralized authorities, we can refrain from calling the cops or code enforcement unless it’s a life and death matter.

One hallmark of societal collapse is that people start to get tempted to allow & encourage more authoritarian government. It’s happening already.

We can look within and start to deprogram our programmed reflex to “call mom to solve our problems.” If I find a guy sleeping in my driveway, I don’t call the cops. If I see squatters in a vacant property, I feel more empathy for the squatters than for the negligent landlord who obviously has too much property. And I don’t call code enforcement or the cops. Of course I care about my neighbors and want them to feel safe, but excess policing is not the way to make that happen. In any case, if a neighbor feels unsafe, I leave it to them to call the authorities; I don’t need to do it.

And something like an RV or boat parked in a yard? Or a bootleg food truck or something? Forget about it — I’m just glad they’re here! These are the kind of neighbors I want.

Do you know that there are some neighborhood associations and/or municipalities that forbid somebody to park their own commercial van in their own driveway? Like, a family that have been commercial fishers for five generations were cited for parking their own van in their own driveway. Or, the neighborhoods where everyone expects the air-conditioning repair service to come at the snap of a finger 24-7, but they don’t allow the air-conditioning repair person to park their own truck in front of their own house. This kind of nonsense is classist nitpicking at its worst, and is just adding unnecessary suffering, during a time when so many people are already dealing with upheaval.

Here is the article I mentioned at the beginning of this post:

What is to be done? Thoughts on degrowth strategy” (Ted Trainer, resilience.org).

The last part of the article goes into some particularly inspiring, and very doable, descriptions of what an alternative parallel economy might look like. He mentions Transition Towns, Neighbourhoods That Work, and the Catalan Integral Cooperative as viable existing models.

Here’s a brief quote; the bold and italics were added by me for emphasis:

“These initiatives would be creating an alternative needs-driven economy that enabled us to contribute to producing and getting important things, underneath/beside the existing normal profit-driven economy. We target needs that the mainstream economy fails to attend to. We are bringing unused resources and idle labour together to produce important things. Especially significant, we are enabling people dumped by the normal economy to produce and earn and contribute and enjoy a caring community. We are no threat to the town chamber of commerce; existing businesses would benefit, for instance when we sell fresh vegetables to the restaurants.”

*************

Are you ready to go more in-depth, and get into the nuts and bolts of planning and executing? I offer workshops for neighborhood associations, congregations, and other grassroots groups. You are welcome to contact me by email or text; or by voice phone if you need to.

Eco landscaping celebrities

Starting a file of “celebrity/famous” landscape designers who are helping to reset the norms of what is considered beautiful. And who are helping to heal ecosystems and people in the process! Please feel free to share more of your favorites.

#aesthetics #reset #naturalyards

Sewing-kit upcycled from empty chewing-gum container

Upcycle use of a pack of Orbit sugarless chewing-gum. The plastic packs are a handy waterproof container.

Today was the first time I thought to repurpose a bottle cap as a thread-cutter, which is very handy since I don’t have mini scissors to give out to everybody but I have lots of bottle caps. And then it also occurred to me that it can serve as an emergency thimble.

What are some other possible use as you can think of? I thought of a fire-starting kit with matches, candle, tinder etc. Or a medicinal/first-aid kit.

ADDED LATER: Cool, I was able to fit the same components into a smaller gum container. Also, I’m showing you one of my old pride and joy, a little sewing kit made out of one of those tiny mint-tins. The surface had gotten rusty enough for me to be able to paint my own words over the original label, while retaining the original label’s cute design elements that I liked.

You can see pics here.

When it comes to choosing a low-footprint lifestyle, self-expression is one of the most fun parts. And the little things like this add up! Never underestimate the value of reuse: keeping things out of the waste stream. And a lot of times the things we make are superior to what we could go buy new. A lot of people might enjoy these as gifts, and many of us have the ingredients already lying around our homes and craft closets. Furthermore, it could be a fun activity for crafty kids and adults to do together. And can most definitely lead to a wider interest in sewing …

There could also be a mini kit version for fishing, carpentry, painting or other pursuits.

BTW when we were kids, we used to create what we called “trouble-making kits”, using empty cough-drop tins. The trouble-making kids would contain nefarious equipment such as fishing line, paper clips, mini pencils and tiny shells and rocks. I don’t remember ever having made any actual trouble with any of them, but hey, it’s the thought that counts!

Boomers’ generational shaming memes continue unabated

The latest smug boomer meme on my feed:

“Some of you came from the ‘If you stop crying, I’ll buy you something’ generation. We came from the ‘If you don’t stop crying, I’ll give you something to cry about’ generation. We are not the same.”

Um … Like this is a flex??? <nausea emoticon> Are we actually trying to shame the younger generations for being soft/indulged just because they weren’t raised to be afraid of their parents???

These generational shaming/bragging memes never end!! We Boomers are really putting the hashtag in #OKBoomer ! — and I say that as a Boomer!! Geez Louise!

We need to stop taking the credit for the way our parents (and grandparents) raised us, and we need to stop blaming younger generations for the way we raised them.

If we were so strong and tough and self-sacrificing … What the heck happened to us now? At some point we morphed into entitled consumers leading robber-baron lifestyles. And this seems to have picked up even more steam after the pandemic.

Seems like we’ve turned into the “I’m old now — I’m entitled to consume whatever and however I want, even though it’s trashing the planet!” generation. Well, we always were the “Me Generation” after all.

And no, I’m not talking about boomers of the MAGA/ Drill Baby Drill variety (they are after all behaving in accordance with their beliefs); I’m talking about those of us who identify with Earth Day and Woodstock. Those of us who say that the environment and climate need to be top priorities — and yet we keep on keeping on the consumerist bandwagon. WWWTP!? (What’s Wrong With This Picture)

Our grandkids need models of sensible thrift and simple living. They need us to show them that life can be full of joy and creativity without constantly acquiring a bunch of stuff and junk, and running around burning up resources without a thought to the repercussions.

So many liberal boomers on social media — posting about their sixth cruise and their second vacation house and their umpteenth international flight this year, blah blah blah.

And then right on the heels of that, posting self-righteous memes about the big bad corporations and the evil government that are driving climate change. Do we even hear ourselves, I wonder.