Author: jennynazak

Good Morning, Morning Stars!!
Beach, coffee, laundry, …

Next: Esplanade market, then neighbors’ gathering at Gus’s (all locals are invited, and I will be bringing some Mexican Miracle Spinach Tree cuttings if anyone is interested).

Then continuing w house cleanup gig so it’ll be walker-safe & spiffy when beloved elder gets home from hospital.

A fellow eco-minded citizen in my Facebook circles tagged me re. this story (“Making 3,000 bricks a day from invasive seaweed”; link at bottom of post) so I thought I’d post it here. This story rings a bell, think I saw it awhile back.

My take is …

1) Invasive seaweed??? I’m skeptical that invasive seaweed exists. Could be it’s there healing the ecosystem and/or feeding marine wildlife. I am curious and I’m going to check that out.

(BTW for various reasons I tend to look askance at the concept of “invasive” in general. Various posts are being made about this (= unpacking our concept of “invasive”) in eco groups, generating lots of good chewy discussion.)

In any case,

2) I don’t think making bricks from seaweed is a good use of energy, or of seaweed. Seems like a waste of the nutrients of seaweed, even supposing the seaweed is invasive. If the seaweed is truly invasive and causing problems, I would scoop it up and use it as farm or garden fertilizer. Someone could probably even make a local micro business of it. Either by hand-cart or motorized vehicle.

3) With all the conventional bricks & other building materials out there that are being sent into landfill after demolitions etc., seems best for people & planet that we reuse those, capturing the energy that’s already embodied in them. This is in keeping with the permaculture design principle of catching, storing, and using energy.

Sharing here in case someone among the many knowledgeable people in this community might know offhand; also good topic for discussion.

Insider Science: Making 3,000 bricks a day from invasive seaweed (Facebook Reels video)

In Transformative Adventures, Deep Adaptation, and some of the other groups, many of us are unpacking our indoctrination regarding the concept of land “ownership” and are advocating for alternatives.

The following post started as a comment that I made in a thread in the TA group that I started about people looking for land, and land needing people. Here’s the thread. It’s sparked a nice chewy subthread about attitudes toward land ownership.

I “own” a piece of land and house which I purchased with money I inherited when my parents passed.

Up until then for many years I had been a housing-precarious renter, sometimes skipping meals or taking dangerous gigs to make the rent. And a few of the roommates I invited in to help cover costs turned out to be unsettling or in one case outright threatening. (To be fair, I was dealing with a lot of mental health stuff and may well have come across as unsettling to the people I was inviting to room with me as well. I know that was true of one person for sure.)

(For a long time, til relatively recently, I had always beat up myself a lot: My economic circumstances were something I blamed on myself, since I dropped out of the so-called “respectable” middle-class office track — that my social indoctrination had carved for me — in order to be a full-time ecosocial activist.)

I am using the place I occupy in the most sharing ways that I know how (including having housemates, and creating “porous property” with benches at corners and edges, where the general public can simply come sit and rest under the trees), and I keep expanding my sharing in new creative ways as my consciousness around this expands.

If there were a way for me to cede this place totally to collective use without myself becoming economically unstable and possibly becoming a burden on my siblings and society, I would.

Maybe that day will arrive when I think of, or we collectively create, a way to have that.

In the meantime I will continue to advocate collectively for the Land Back movement.

Also, I am going to look into starting to pay an honor tax to the indigenous peoples who were on the land where my ancestors arrived in the 1600s. I earn a very low income (by choice now, though it was not by choice at first) but can still find a way to do this.

I just learned about an honor tax today in this podcast, The Response: ‘Land Back’ with David Cobb. The podcast came my way via a link in the always-excellent email newsletter from Shareable.net

The podcast also presents an excellent overview of the #LandBack movement, and presents some very exciting projects including an initiative to restore several old houses within a few blocks of each other in a city, and turning them into housing for youth who have aged out of the foster-care system. It’s a wonderful segment of The Response podcast.

I hope you will enjoy this podcast as much as I have! It’s a great antidote for privileged white doomerism.

A quote from the segment:

“The idea of Land Back — a growing movement to return occupied land to the Indigenous people that it rightfully belongs to, often exists as a metaphor for us. It can feel like the discussion around land theft and genocide by settler-colonists in the United States is often limited to land acknowledgments or statements of solidarity — both of which are important. But what about the most important element in these discussions — actually giving the land back?

“Today on the show, we’ve brought on David Cobb, a ‘people’s lawyer,’ self-proclaimed revolutionary, and advancement manager for the Wiyot Tribe’s Dishgamu Humboldt Community Land Trust in Northern California.”

On a related note:

On this site and my other channels (and increasingly in other permaculture spaces as well, as more of us learn the antecedents), we are not using the term “homestead”; “homesteading.” It is a genocidal term, and one that indigenous people in our groups have asked us to stop using.

“Homesteading” was the name of a law that pushed Native Americans off their homelands and caused deaths and loss of culture. We want to actively work to make permaculture-type spaces a setting where all can feel genuinely welcome and comfortable existing.

An alternative term that’s coming into use is “smallholding.” I also like “permaculture homesite.” And somebody just shared that they classify themself as a “smallhold homecrafter.” That one really resonates with me and I might just start using it.

“It’s like before we all had washing machines, and we did ‘wash’ together. Things done together have a different energy and feel so much less overwhelming.” (From a conversation in the Unpacking Whiteness group facilitated by Desiree B Stephens on Mighty Networks.)

Yes! This is so true, about how tasks done together have a different energy and feel so much better. Rejuvenating, connecting, while getting work done.

Recently a friend and I watched a movie called “Hannah.” The two main characters were self-sufficient father & daughter living in a Northern forest. The father was training the daughter to be a hard-core fighter for some secret agency.

And it struck me that most of my fellow white people in the doomer prepper groups I hang out in would be admiring the northern forest duo and using them as the standard to aim for.

But the characters I loved and admired and wanted to hang out with, were the Berber tribeswomen we got a glimpse of in passing (the film plot involved an international chase) who were standing in & around the water at an oasis in Morocco, laughing and singing while doing laundry together. THAT was the world that drew me. Always has been.

Work in isolation is exhausting and divides us all. Capitalist culture!

Work in community is connection and learning together and singing and laughing, and then we don’t need to indulge in consumer goods or consumerist tourist “vacations” to “escape” from our lives.

Laundry in the capitalist world sucks. What a chore, fancy machinery notwithstanding. Same with other chores.

(And: Even being together in a laundromat is at least something.)

(And: Even being together in a laundromat is at least something. I don’t think it’s any coincidence that my neighborhood has lost three laundromats in the 10 years I’ve lived here. Anything communal gets devalued and falls by the wayside because only people in the “lower economic classes” use those things anymore and no one cares when they break. The owners move on to a new “business venture,” and everyday people end up having to lug their laundry on the bus, taking extra time and money.)

In unrelated yet related news, three members of a Colorado family have died of starvation or exposure while trying to live “off the grid.” They were found in a tent at an altitude of over 9000 feet. Most of the examples of off grid madness that I see are less extreme than this, but as a rule our individualistic culture is killing us. This kind of thing is a trauma response unless someone is fleeing actual disaster in their faces.

My current nonfiction book read-in-progress in the Deep Adaptation/Degrowth genre is Love in the Age of Ecological Apocalypse, by Carolyn Baker. She remarks on how so many people try to form intentional communities without really doing the human connection part. Mainly just emphasizing material resources and hard skills. It doesn’t work.

A quote:

“Overwhelmingly, I have observed several groups of well-meaning individuals attempting to form communities or groups based entirely on reason and intellect. It is as if they assume that since they are all rational human beings with good intentions who operate on the same page in terms of a particular issue, if they just work together they will accomplish their goals. Sometimes the same individuals avoid books, workshops, articles, and other resources on emotional literacy and communication skills. Occasionally, I have been told by workshop participants that a process in which I’m leading the group is ‘so seventies,’ and I’ve also been told from time to time that my workshops are “too touchy-feely.” Really? Then why is it so painfully difficult for people raised in this culture to resolve conflicts and functionally communicate with one another? Some of the same individuals who tell me that my work is too touchy-feely contact me months or years later and report that their working group fell apart because of personal conflicts and they want help restarting or reconstructing the group.”

How weird and bizarre. Facebook just sent me a notification that my request to participate in a group called “Fun Ladies of Volusia County” had been denied. The reason given was that I do not meet the qualifications or standards of the group.

Now, the truth is I DON’T meet the qualifications/standards of the group. That part of being denied wasn’t weird. Because, by the mainstream “fun lady” standards of western industrial capitalist society, I am most definitely NOT fun. <laughing w tears icon>

Unless your definition of “fun” is someone who is always going on about permaculture design principles, native plants, heat mitigation, stormwater harvesting, steady-state economics, anarchist philosophy, and urban redevelopment issues.

And ranting on about how deeply she despises leafblowers, and loves eating in restaurants. And pondering the attributes of the perfect martini or Negroni cocktail. (Which she prefers to drink in a restaurant or bar alone, with a book or writing notebook in hand.)

So yeah, not a FUN lady in the conventional sense. So that part of me being denied admittance wasn’t weird. The thing that was weird is that I never requested to join a group by that name in the first place.
<emoticons: puzzled; The Scream; alien face>

Oh my gosh, I would NEVER. That would be so rude!

Just like I would never presume to try to intrude upon a group called Taekwondo Enthusiasts. Or Arctic Sailors, or Surveillance Camera Technicians for Increased Surveillance. Or the Ice Cream Abolitionists’ League. 

It could be that I hit a button by mistake or something. That does happen. Anyway: As you were, Fun Ladies of Volusia County! Your group is totally safe from me. Get on with your pursuit of good, normal, wholesome, ladylike fun. <wink>

(NOTE, since some of you have privately expressed reactions I did not expect: This is a humorous post, warranting full-on laugh react. I do not actually think that any live humans intentionally rejected me. That’s not what this post is about. It’s about laughing with joy about freely being a nerd who has non-mainstream-feminine ideas of “fun.” And, it’s about pondering the foibles of technology.)

I have made a number of posts on the topic of ethically building security for our old age. But thought I would go ahead and copy-share this, which I wrote in response to a fellow middle-aged woman in the Transformative Adventures group who asked people to share their thoughts/plans for retirement.

My plan is to continue what I am doing now: only earn the bare amount of money to pay taxes and home repair expenses and other basic expenses, and tithe to my community.

My occupation “sustainability educator” will see me through the rest of my life, as it has various aspects. I love my work and am not into the “retirement” concept.

As I get older (I’m 60 now), I don’t expect to be doing as much of the vigorous outdoor component of my landscaping work. (I already mostly serve as a referral service to young entrepreneurs who are just getting into eco landscaping.)

But I will be continuing to teach and write and make art and so on. For as long as I live. Another way I earn income is by renting out 2 bedrooms in my house at very very modest rates, just enough to cover expenses and have a small fund for emergency repairs, hurricane prep/cleanup etc.

I consider having housemates to be under my “sustainability educator” umbrella. And it brings me deep satisfaction to provide housing security to people especially in this day and age of housing crunch.

Of course Social Security will help with income also, if that program still exists by the time I’d be collecting Social Security.

Medical: in a few years I will qualify for Medicare or Medicaid which will take care of some medical bills if I have them. But my main plan is basically pull the plug if I am incapacitated. I have already instructed my siblings in writing about this. And if I am conscious and get some super dreadful expensive disease, I will choose some form of voluntary death.

Or it is possible that I might choose to try to pursue medical treatment, if my small savings was enough to cover it and/or I could get the money for surgery etc. through sales of my books or what have you. That too is to me a realistic option. I am still always prepared to choose voluntary death if the situation warrants. I do not consider myself a civilian, and whatever happens to me happens to me within the line of duty.

On this topic of death — I am a death doula in training, and I find that this aspect of my work overlaps greatly with my planetary activism.

My main focus is on living a deeply meaningful life right now, and helping my community as much as I possibly can.
It’s a joyful and rewarding existence, and tomorrow is never guaranteed.

FB friend posted:

“Giant spider trapped in a bowl in my living room, what to do? We’re ***ing terrified”

I responded:

Awww!
I usually use one of those sturdy glossy junk-mail postcards, slide it under the bowl or jar. (And if necessary, then slide another sturdy piece of something like cardboard under that as reinforcement.)

Thereby it is easy to safely transport Ms. Eight-Leggy back to her outdoor home, where she will find the food and other things she needs, and you can have your livingroom back.

(Other people made similar comments. It was really nice to see people supporting the safe removal of the spider, as opposed to killing. Several people pointed out that it was probably a wolf spider or a huntsman, both of whom are not harmful to humans. And furthermore are avid predators of insects who love LIVE to bite humans.)

I use my transport method to rehome other species as well, such as our giant palmetto bugs. (They are utterly harmless but that doesn’t mean I want them crawling on me while I’m sleeping.)