The “Fully Established System” Fallacy

“There is much to be said about permaculture in the 40 years since its creation, but there don’t seem to be many fully established systems promoting themselves. There appears to be limited peer-reviewed data to back up the claims of permaculture as a successful means of offsetting our current crisis.” (Quote from this article.)

My response: The very concept of a “fully established system” is a widespread popular fallacy that is an artifact of our limited (Western industrial-white-colonialist) human minds. Nature is always dynamic and in flux; and humans living in right relationship with Mother Earth are constantly co-evolving and co-creating with Her.

In my opinion as a bioregionalist, community activist, microbusiness advocate, and permaculture designer/educator:
“Fully established system” is a money-centric, human-centric, colonialist utilitarian term that is part of the problem, and perpetuates modern human disconnect from the rest of nature.

Even the three permaculture sites cited by the article’s author as examples of “successful sites,” are dynamic not static. And will only continue to be successful inasmuch as they are constantly evolving in collaboration with their local residents (including all species, and the surrounding ecosystems, not just the human residents and other human beneficiaries of the sites).

And a great comment from my fellow permie educator/landscaper Mike Hoag of Transformative Adventures:

“I think there are too many! Ha! I know of literally hundreds of fully established sites promoting themselves. Lillie House is the first keystone project site associated with TransformativeAdventures.org and it has had thousands of visitors. As to peer reviewed data, this is not possible or even scientific to do. It misunderstands what permaculture is, thinking it is a technique, which it clearly is not. You will not find a single study claiming to prove that “engineering” works either. If engineering is done well, it uses research based methods to achieve goals, so it is successful, it works. Then the proof is in the pudding. Same with permaculture. Saying ”there is no peer reviewed data” is a misunderstanding of scientific methods.”

Plea to My Fellow Greenies: Please Minimize Needless In-Person Travel to Meetings

My comment just now on a fellow eco activist’s Facebook post asking folks to show up at a county council meeting. The post mentioned virtual attendance as an option. (Even before the pandemic, this is how I felt. We eco/climate activists need to walk our walk by using appropriate lower-footprint technology to minimize our need for in-person appearances that gratuitously burn petroleum or jet fuel. Now, with the pandemic — and any future pandemics coming down the pike — my opinion has extra justification.)

Hey fellow local earth guardians!! <three green hearts>

As your friendly neighborhood “carbon footprint conscience” eco activist, I strongly encourage virtual attendance rather than in-person.

Too much in-person running around is contributing to the road-traffic that is a big part of what is leading to sprawl development, road congestion, and other damage that is precipitating the need for the very “land preservation” we are advocating for.

My two cents: Unless you live in walking or cycling distance of this meeting (or any other meetings), I strongly encourage you to attend virtually, or else just give your comments by email or direct phone call to your officials.

As a bonus, you will save yourself hours of time & energy between having to get dressed up for an outside-of-your-neighborhood event, sitting in traffic, finding parking, sitting inside a closed-in environment with no outside fresh air circulation, etc.

* And — Special Eco Karma Hearts and Stars: Thank you so much <name of grassroots local eco warrior leader who wrote the original post> for keeping us informed, and for all you are doing to lead us in preserving our precious bioregional treasures. <numerous star, green heart, & butterfly emoticons>

Response later from the activist who made the announcement: “I’m sorry Jenny, but in person is IMPORTANT with this situation. It makes a HUGE difference.”

My response to them just now:

That’s what people often say, for every meeting. But — Reflect on the success you have created here — mostly via emails, online petitions, Facebook posts, and other things that don’t involve people needlessly getting in cars.

I am 100% supportive of this [land preservation] effort, as you well know <heart>. [Side note for my readers here: I donated $1,000 of my economic-stimulus money to the online crowd-fund for the preservation effort led by their group. Before that, behind the scenes, I encouraged them to do said crowd-funding campaign in the first place. I have also spent many hours publicizing their posts, often taking additional care to custom-write an intro for specific audiences. Not trying to brag; just pointing out the power of online, as I did all of this without getting in a car.]

I’m just calling on the folks who are willing to contribute from home, and/or are unable to be there in person, and/or prefer to model use of alternative modes. Think of my call as an EXPANSION of the field of participants.
Some people are inevitably gonna keep driving to these things no matter what; I have little or no influence over that. But, both for this immediate meeting and for the long term, I am trying to support expansion of participation, via alternative, low-footprint modes.

We cannot afford to keep modeling car-dependence, least of all in our eco activism.

And (in response to a subsequent comment where they told me they’d been enduring a lot of criticism):

Shame on any armchair critics who have the gall to malign you and your awesome efforts. It makes me sick to hear of a fellow activist getting attacked.

BTW please do not take my plea to minimize driving as criticism; it is directed at all efforts by all fellow eco activists. I’m trying to help us conserve our human energy, as well as model a commitment to minimizing the car travel that is a huge root of the problems we are now tasked with trying to solve. You know I totally support this cause.

And yet another comment I added later, regarding the topic of activists getting criticized for one thing or other:

BTW re criticism: As a person who first began thinking of herself as an eco activist about 30 years ago, and actively participating in actions accordingly, I have all that time been hearing criticism from non-environmentalists, regarding the fact that people call themselves environmentalists yet they needlessly drive or fly to environmental protests.

Frankly, I had no good response to their criticism because I feel, and have always felt, they are right. Instead, I have sought to practice and promote non-car-dependent, non-airplane-flying style of activism.

In that vein, over the past year I have attended probably two dozen conferences/meetings, action planning, etc, with a total of possibly 10,000 activist-type people or maybe even more. Online.

Postscript:

(By the way, I suspect that the compulsive need felt by some of us activists to appear in person at meetings may sometimes be ego-driven. Often, however, I suspect it stems from everyday citizens’ legitimate fear of not being seen and heard by officials. But continuing to burn fossil fuels needlessly isn’t the answer; building person-to-person relationships with officials is. And quite honestly, these days that is simpler than ever, thanks to social media and multiple other online channels in addition to the good old standard mail and telephone — which are still very effective, by the way. If you want/need tips for building/strengthening such ties (other than what you’ve read in this blog and my book), contact me and I will be happy to help you/your organization. We need to set a good example and break the knee-jerk reflex of jumping in our cars needlessly.

Also: A major advantage of online channels, which is often overlooked by the “adamantly in-person-is-a-must” crowd, is the greatly multiplied broadcast potential. Virally compelling tweets; Facebook Lives reaching across both distance and time to reach thousands of hearts; etc. In essence, we each have our own free TV channels, radio channels, advertising agencies, and publishing companies! Think 20 or 50 or more people showing up to a meeting in person with signs or matching t-shirts is powerful? It can be, for sure — but a creatively designed broadcast version of this has the potential to increase the power many-thousand-fold.

Just one little example (you can come up with any number of variants that might be much better ideas): Ask your 20 or 50 cohorts to snap selfies with the sign or t-shirt. Gather the snapshots into a big digital collage, post it on your City or County government page, plus pages of individual officials, plus Twitter, NextDoor etc. And takes a tiny fraction of the time and footprint of 20 or 50 people getting in cars, sitting in traffic, looking for parking etc.

For extra boost, do your selfies where your neighbors, who are by definition “naturally in person,” can see them.

Bringing In the Big Guns

In my talks and writings, I emphasize the power of grassroots efforts. Here is one prime example. Local eco activists in my area have helped bring about awareness of a manatee die-off crisis, leading to a federal investigation.

(Yes, ironically, sometimes grassroots action needs to entail bringing in higher levels of government. This can happen when citizens living on the frontlines observe that they are not being listened to by their local powers-that-be, and/or that the response from their local and regional governments to a bioregional-level crisis is inadequate.)

I posted the following to local eco activist groups on Facebook this morning. (Special tech note for social-media activist geeks: The text “Manatee Deaths Prompt Fed Investig” after the article link is to preserve the link, which Facebook otherwise swallows up.)

With deep respect and gratitude to <names of two key local eco activists> and all the other local eco-guardians whose efforts have contributed to bringing about this crucial investigation. A big step in the right direction. <green heart emoticon>

#EarthWarriors #GrassrootsGreenMobilization #BioregionalConsciousness

Here’s the link to the article – thank you Daytona Beach News-Journal for covering this story: http://daytonanewsjournal.fl.newsmemory.com/publink.php?shareid=10a7d50a4

Manatee Deaths Prompt Fed Investig

Quote from the article: “The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced Tuesday the recent spate of manatee deaths in the Indian River Lagoon would be declared an unusual mortality event, channeling muchneeded federal resources into an investigation of what’s causing the die-off. … More than 60% of the 2021 deaths — 4.5 deaths per day— have occurred in counties on the Indian River Lagoon, the 156-mile-long estuary that stretches from Ponce de Leon Inlet in Volusia County to Jupiter Inlet in Palm Beach County. … executive director of Save the Manatee Club, said as of Monday, the non-profit had documented 539 deaths and 80 rescues statewide in 2021.”

Further Exploration:

Save the Manatee Club is an example of how the efforts of a local/bioregional-level volunteer organization formed around the love of one charismatic animal or plant can help raise awareness that (ideally) will ultimately lead to the restoration of entire ecosystems. I think it’d be great if every bioregion had clubs like this for different species.

Eyeglasses, Dental Floss, and Shoes

From a friend/colleague posting in one of the permie groups: “Looking for comments by those whose household income is less than $20,000 per year US: Eyeglasses, dental floss and shoes are not likely to be produced from our 1 acre anytime soon … so… Realising the importance of divesting from anti-permaculture structures, if purchasing xxxx costs $50 from Satan Industries and $100 from Good-Earth Corp, how does one get there? How have you transitioned?”

My response:

I mostly buy shoes used. And I only like to have 2-3 pairs. (My two latest acquisitions were 1) an upscale (sturdy leather w sturdy cloth-braided thong) pair of flipflops. Yard sale, $2. And 2) rubber work boots; free via a house downsizing job where we workers got to keep certain stuff we wanted).

Dental floss I buy at store that is within walking distance. When the place within walking distance offers eco options, I buy those. I consider shipping and packaging from mail-order as part of my “eco and corporate goodness equation”.
I only need to buy a roll of dental floss every couple of months. Therefore I don’t mind paying quite a bit extra for “kinder” option if it is available.

Eyeglasses I buy a pair about every 3-5 years (actually one pair may have lasted me 8 years, can’t recall), from the shop at my eye doctor’s office. They may be $300 but since I only need one pair every few years, it’s do-able.

Income FYI: I generally make about 12-13k before taxes.

Re shoes again, I may someday spend a big chunk of money (even $600 or more) to get custom-made moccasins. It is do-able even on my income, budgeting wisely. I like the idea of supporting handcrafting micro-industries; building a relationship. But for now, both ecologically and budget-wise, I prefer to buy used. The quality is often far superior to what I can get new.

Additional note: Possibly my best-ever pair of boots, a pair of black Skechers which I used for both work and travel, and even some indoor-type occasions, were purchased for $4 from a thrift shop in Austin. I had the boots for about 7 years before passing them on. And they were still totally wearable when I passed them on to the next recipient.

A Year of Shutdown, and Homeschooling

(Following is a “copy-paste guest post” from Dr. Jenny Lloyd Strovas, with her gracious permission. And if you love this content, be sure and join her Facebook group Getting Kids Outside & Learning About Nature – with Dr. Jenny to keep up with her latest workshops and other offerings. Participation in the group is free.)

Today was the day that everything shut down for us, exactly one year ago.

It was the day I started homeschooling my kids.

It was the day that everything I’d worked so hard to build in my business over the last 3 years started falling apart – and fall apart it did.

It was the beginning of a year where I was with my kids every single moment of every single day without EVER having a break. Turns out, you really start to value self care when you no longer have any time to yourself.

It was the day I started waking up at 4am every morning (again) just so I could get something done before the kids would wake up. But there’s never enough time and things are always falling through the cracks.

It was the year where I started dropping balls left and right because I just didn’t have the ability to keep them all in the air.

It was the year where we saw friends and family lose their financial security, their good health, and even their lives.

It’s been a very hard year.

But, it’s also the year where I got to help my son brainstorm and start his very own successful business.

It’s the year we learned how to make food and medicine from organic plants and even plants in our own backyard – pine salve, ginger beer, sourdough, juniper salve, lip balm, snakeweed tea, and more!

It’s the year that I learned my son wasn’t getting what he needed in school and that I needed to be more purposeful about leveraging the way his brain works to help him learn better – and to really love learning.

It’s the year Briar has always wanted – one with 24 hour access to mama and no day care – ha!

It’s the year that my kids have spent SO MUCH TIME OUTSIDE simply because they have that space in their calendars now. And we get to learn outside together on a daily basis instead of a special lesson one day a week.

It was the year I learned that I could teach kids about their local ecosystem from a distance (online) and that parents are TRULY the best conduit to getting kids outside and connected to nature.

And when I asked my kids what they think they’ll remember most about COVID 30 years from now, they said, “We got to spend so much time outside.”

Now, what I remember is going to be a little different – ha! But knowing that they are happy and healthy despite the craziness of the world is worth it all.

Let’s take today to celebrate everything we have in midst of this pandemic and maybe even because of it.

What are you going to celebrate today?

P.S. If this year wasn’t an opportunity to get your kids outside more often and learning, we’d love to help! Our eBook, Reuniting Child with Nature: Nature’s Guide to Happier and Healthier Kids” will give you everything you need to get started!

You can grab it here: https://www.naturemattersacademy.com/reunitingchildrenwithnature

Reuniting Children with Nature

(Following is a “copy-paste guest post” from Dr. Jenny Lloyd Strovas, with her gracious permission. Enjoy the post, and check out all these great publications she offers, for very reasonable prices. You’ll also find a registration link for her Back to Nature Bootcamp. And if you love this content, be sure and join her Facebook group Getting Kids Outside & Learning About Nature – with Dr. Jenny to keep up with her latest offerings. Participation in the group is free.)

Hello and WELCOME to the group!

We’re a community of parents who believe that nature is the KEY to the type of childhood ALL kids should have – one of creativity, exploration, discovery, and learning.

Who we are:
–We empower parents with the tools, skills, and mindset to create a nature-based childhood for their kids – to create a family nature legacy.
–We are parents who know that a STEM-based nature education will help our kids reach their potential and be successful in school and in life.
— We know that developing a connection to nature is personal, so we must learn how our kids best engage with nature.
–We know that spending quality time outside together as a family strengthens family bonds and will create the type of childhood that memories are made of.

Who we are NOT:
–We are not bean counters and don’t keep track of hours.
–We are not mud kitchens and fairy gardens.
–We are not a factory for nature activities. (We empower you to design your own and make them personal for your kids.)

If you’d like to get your kids outside more but have a hard time getting out the door, then our eBook can help!

It explains why our kids need to be outside regularly, how to get out there, where to go, what to bring, and even what to do!

Download “Reuniting Children with Nature: Nature’s Guide to Happier & Healthier Kids” here

If you already get outside regularly with your kids but need more ideas for activities, then our 60 Academic Nature Activities download would be a perfect fit for your family.

To promote your kids academics, we include 15 STEM Nature Challenges, 15 Nature Projects, 15 Nature Writing Prompts, and 15 Nature Crafts. We’ve even grouped them into categories like seeds, birds, beetles, flowers, etc.

If you want to get your kids outside and learning, download our 60 Academic Nature Activities here

But if you’re looking for transformation. If you’re wanting to create the type of childhood that all kids should have – one that’s full of creativity, exploration, discovery, and learning – then you should join our Back to Nature Bootcamp.

In our Back to Nature Bootcamp we give parents the tools and confidence to transform your kids’ childhood – to create a family nature legacy that will help them grow into happy, healthy, and successful adults.

To jumpstart your nature legacy, join our Back to Nature Bootcamp here

Climate Migration Is Well Under Way; and “The Unbearable Whiteness of the Climate Movement”

In my book, one suggestion I make to fellow eco activists is to face up to the scariest news about the environment, but not to an excess degree. If we totally shield ourselves from looking the eco/humanitarian crisis in the eye, we risk becoming complacent and dropping our efforts. But if we only focus on the crisis and never take in any news of solutions, we risk becoming overwhelmed and dropping our efforts.

Here is one article I consider to be necessary reading right now, for all humanitarian eco activists. (“The Great Climate Migration Has Begun”; by Abrahm Lustgarten in New York Times.)

“For most of human history, people have lived within a surprisingly narrow range of temperatures, in the places where the climate supported abundant food production. But as the planet warms, that band is suddenly shifting north. … the planet could see a greater temperature increase in the next 50 years than it did in the last 6,000 years combined. By 2070, the kind of extremely hot zones, like in the Sahara, that now cover less than 1 percent of the earth’s land surface could cover nearly a fifth of the land, potentially placing one of every three people alive outside the climate niche where humans have thrived for thousands of years. … The window for action is closing. The world can now expect that with every degree of temperature increase, roughly a billion people will be pushed outside the zone in which humans have lived for thousands of years. For a long time, the climate alarm has been sounded in terms of its economic toll, but now it can increasingly be counted in people harmed.”

The article starts out with an account of one Guatemalan farmer who is being pushed to leave his country in order to keep his family from starvation, after not having seen almost no rain for five years. He is only one of millions of people around the world who are facing such extreme hardship. We in the USA and elsewhere in the industrialized north have so far been artificially insulated from the worst impacts, but as drought-flood extremes in the Midwest farm belt show, it is happening here too.

And on this note, another article I consider to be essential reading right now is one that brings up the self-centeredness and white privilege of the mainstream “climate movement.”

(“The Unbearable Whiteness of Climate Anxiety”; by Sarah Jacquette Ray in Scientific American.)

“If people of color are more concerned about climate change than white people, why is the interest in climate anxiety so white? Is climate anxiety a form of white fragility or even racial anxiety? Put another way, is climate anxiety just code for white people wishing to hold onto their way of life or get “back to normal,” to the comforts of their privilege?

“The white response to climate change is literally suffocating to people of color. Climate anxiety can operate like white fragility, sucking up all the oxygen in the room and devoting resources toward appeasing the dominant group. As climate refugees are framed as a climate security threat, will the climate-anxious recognize their role in displacing people from around the globe? Will they be able to see their own fates tied to the fates of the dispossessed? Or will they hoard resources, limit the rights of the most affected and seek to save only their own, deluded that this xenophobic strategy will save them? How can we make sure that climate anxiety is harnessed for climate justice?”

When I saw the title of the Scientific American article, I didn’t get it at first. For me, “worry about climate change” makes me want to be sure we are growing food everywhere people live. And makes me want to promote social shift that will stop the USA from consuming a disproportionate share of the world’s resources.

And, makes me want to ensure that the USA makes room for climate refugees from other countries, since our policies and our consumption have accelerated the effects of climate change in countries in the tropics, Global South, Asia. There’s no point in “surviving” climate change, in a few selected temperate pockets of the world, if we lose our souls and go morally bankrupt in the process.

If we stop degrading land and wasting resources, we’ll have plenty to welcome everyone who wants or needs to come to the USA. Build a wall; lose our souls.

Also, if we act now, we might even be able to reverse some of the climate damage that’s threatening millions of people with starvation and violence, so they aren’t forced to give up their home and land. People don’t do that lightly. And I would say that given how our policies and our consumerist culture have contributed to the problem, we have a moral obligation to be part of the solution.

Please go read both of the above-mentioned articles; I think you will find them helpful in staying centered and grounded amid the clamor of climate naysayers and eco disparagers, so you can keep on showing up to do your chosen part of the work. Thanks for helping to build the momentum of the #GrassrootsGreenMobilization !